Teams

CF - Moore

2026 Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday · Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 18 9:30 AM
vs
Ida Lee Park Tennis Center
Sep 25 9:30 AM
vs
Chestnut Forks Tennis Club
Oct 1 9:30 AM
vs
Ida Lee Park Tennis Center
Oct 6 9:30 AM
vs
Chestnut Forks Tennis Club
Oct 13 9:30 AM
vs
Ida Lee Park Tennis Center
Oct 20 9:30 AM
vs
Chestnut Forks Tennis Club
2026-09-03vs Foxy DawgsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAndrea Moore vs Jennifer Fox6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCristina Mantell vs Mary Ann Larson6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Foxy Dawgs000000
2CF - Moore000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Lindsay Ward
published
3.88
Andrea Moore
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Cristina Mantell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Meghan Wisecarver
published 3.5
3.45
Kendra McQuillan
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Moore + Lindsay Ward8077% games+17.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Ward
18W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Andrea Moore
35W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Cristina Mantell
104W–92L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Meghan Wisecarver
29W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Kendra McQuillan
165W–90L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.