Teams

Winters/JB/AP

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 2.5, 4.5, 5.0 · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-22vs LParker/JB/JCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNikki Bacot / Allison Vaughn vs Lauren Parker / Jessica Kelly7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMolly McCarty / Meredith Ross vs Jessica Blackburn / Bethany Noto3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-17vs Dunham/JB/JCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNikki Bacot / Meredith Ross vs Madeline Cox / Kara Keith6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTristan Winters vs Beth Young6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesEmily Rainwater / Allison Vaughn vs Rachel Milner / Callie Kellums1-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs Trimarchi/JB/APWon 20
W#1 DoublesTristan Winters / Molly McCarty vs Kelli Adkins / Whitney Robinson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Vaughn / Kailey Dowell vs April Grove / Veronica Trimarchi6-4, 6-0
2025-04-10vs Cobern/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Rainwater / Kailey Dowell vs Renee Cobern / Danial Reed4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAllison Vaughn vs Katie Spencer3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNikki Bacot / Molly McCarty vs Michelle Pfriemer / Caroline Wilson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-25vs LParker/JB/JCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesTristan Winters / Meredith Ross vs Bethany Noto / Jessica Blackburn6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEmily Rainwater vs Jessica Kelly7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKailey Dowell / Allison Vaughn vs Lauren Parker / Bobbi Hydrick0-6, 1-6
2025-03-18vs Chambers-Dallas/JB/APCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMolly McCarty / Emily Rainwater vs Hannah Chambers / Linda Smith0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNikki Bacot vs Audra McClung6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeredith Ross / Allison Vaughn vs Janeene Lynch / Beth McCartney7-6, 6-1
2025-02-26vs Wade/JB/RPCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Rainwater / Meredith Ross vs Melanie Burnett / Jordan Loebach4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTristan Winters vs Jeanne Bailey6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMolly McCarty / Kailey Dowell vs Jami Sharp / Kristie Becker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.39
Tristan Winters
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Allison Vaughn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
Emily Rainwater
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Molly McCarty
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nikki Bacot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tristan Winters
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
2.5
Allison Vaughn
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Rainwater
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly McCarty
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Bacot
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.