Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Da Costa)(EPTC#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings11 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Alvarado/Adult 40 & over/3.0W9132820220
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Da Costa)(EPTC#2)82221838323
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Castaneda)(EPCC#2)73271332296
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Alarcon)(TW#2)73231742323
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Delgado)(EPTC#4)64211942352
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Arreola)(EPTC#1)64202044320
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)45201638317
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Cardenas)(CCC)37132759398
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Dennis)27162045313
10GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Boss)(NMSU)19112962407
11GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Wilcox)(TW#1)19112964437

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Diane Lunghi
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.67
Cristina da Costa
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Clara C Esparza
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.11
Cecilia Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Esther McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Eugenie Montague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gloria King
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Jennifer Bush
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Jennifer Ibarra
usually #3 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
Leticia Augsberger
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Luisana Montoya
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Nelly Jallad
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Patricia Moye Holderman
usually #2 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published
Randi Cabrera
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Rosario Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Sheby Parker
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Yuri Caire
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina da Costa + Rosario Mendoza5851% games+8.6% vs expected
Jennifer Bush + Diane Lunghi151057% games+6.9% vs expected
Esther Orona + Diane Lunghi462059% games+1.0% vs expected
Cristina da Costa + Sheby Parker2639% games+0.4% vs expected
Randi Cabrera + Cristina da Costa6946% games−2.5% vs expected
Randi Cabrera + Patricia Moye Holderman3747% games−4.5% vs expected
Esther Orona + Gloria King11753% gamesnot enough data
Leticia Augsberger + Esther McCarthy6943% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Lunghi
141W–95L career · 30 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Cristina da Costa
67W–91L career · 20 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
2.5
Clara C Esparza
16W–32L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cecilia Delgado
27W–43L career · 33 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Esther McCarthy
74W–87L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Esther Orona
123W–106L career · 38 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eugenie Montague
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 62 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Bush
71W–79L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Ibarra
35W–42L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leticia Augsberger
26W–61L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luisana Montoya
52W–35L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nelly Jallad
28W–36L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Moye Holderman
66W–59L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randi Cabrera
54W–66L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosario Mendoza
34W–41L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheby Parker
54W–46L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yuri Caire
52W–39L career · 42 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.