Teams

Winner/FGCU - Crivello

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 18 & Over Fall NONADV · 7.5 M Wednesday EVE

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-12vs FMRC - JordanWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Chris Gold vs Rankin McGougan / Chris Wiles6-4, 6-2
2024-12-04vs Hancock - ZaliauskasLost 01
L#3 DoublesCody Crivello / Carmelo Rubio vs Phillip Trammel / Jeffrey Wheeler5-7, 5-7
2024-11-21vs Lake Kennedy - McGirlLost 01
L#3 DoublesTim Riggs / Carmelo Rubio vs Patrick Altsohn / Camerom Solomon2-6, 2-6
2024-11-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesTim Riggs / Carmelo Rubio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-06vs FMRC - JordanWon 10
W#2 DoublesCody Crivello / Carmelo Rubio vs Jeff Jordan / Kevin Jordan6-2, 7-5
2024-10-30vs Lake Kennedy - McGirlLost 01
L#3 DoublesGavin Szoka / Carmelo Rubio vs Felix Varlam / James Pecenka6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-23vs Hancock - ZaliauskasWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Gold / William Kimmel vs Gindrutis Zaliauskas / John Regets6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTim Riggs / Alejandro Diaz Lucente vs Phillip Trammel / Jeffrey Wheeler6-1, 6-1
2024-10-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Chris Gold vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Wednesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Alejandro Diaz Lucente
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chris Gold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cody Crivello
published 4
3.03
Gary Trewick
published
2.90
Carmelo Rubio
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Gavin Szoka
published
Robert Proben
published
Tim Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
William Kimmel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Riggs + Cody Crivello123 matchesnot enough data
Robert Proben + Alejandro Diaz Lucente213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alejandro Diaz Lucente
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Chris Gold
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Cody Crivello
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gary Trewick
5W–16L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Carmelo Rubio
254W–234L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Gavin Szoka
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Proben
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Riggs
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
William Kimmel
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.