Teams

SFV-Downright Smashing!

SFV-SoCal Doubles-18 & Over · SFV - Women 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-12-18vs SFV-LLW - Holy Guacamole - Lily WuLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Matkin / Kirsten Andrews vs Kristin Nava / Katherine Pyle4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatty Labat / Ami Belcher vs Jennifer Day / Anusha Arcalgud6-7, 0-6
2021-12-12vs SFV-WC - Vamos! - Su CumboSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Soto / Ami Belcher vs Suzanne Cumbo / Janet Wallace5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Crossin / Ashley Matkin vs Chiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga3-6, 4-6
2021-11-19vs SFV-OverservedLost 01
L#2 DoublesKirsten Andrews / Ami Belcher vs Sandra Chavarria-Roe / Jennifer Cotone Gossett5-7, 2-6
2021-10-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Brathwaite / Ami Belcher vs Sandra Chavarria-Roe / Lisa Taylor7-6, 6-3
2021-09-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaula Evans / Ashley Matkin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Sandy Brathwaite
published
4.04
Mary Soto
published
3.95
Ami Belcher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Paula Evans
published
3.81
Teresa Loveland
published 4
3.80
Aimee Butcher
published 4
3.74
Lauri Solano
published
3.71
Kirsten Andrews
published
3.66
Ashley Matkin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsten Andrews + Teresa Loveland3259% games+5.9% vs expected
Lauri Solano + Paula Evans7453% games−0.4% vs expected
Teresa Loveland + Paula Evans314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Soto + Paula Evans033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Brathwaite
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
4.22
Mary Soto
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Ami Belcher
60W–89L career · 4 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.95
Paula Evans
39W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Teresa Loveland
94W–61L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Aimee Butcher
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Lauri Solano
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
Kirsten Andrews
5W–11L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Ashley Matkin
91W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.