Teams

CDTA E 18&O M4.0 MT Chi Brown Sun 12 $28

CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA ESL 18&O M 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.83 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesOwen Priestley / Ted Tubekis vs Alex Chen / Bradley Levin6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRoy Koch vs Tony Lyu2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Boutell / Travis Gayles vs Young Choi / Igor Gogov4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSebastian Ventura vs Andrew Jacobs7-6, 3-2
L#3 DoublesRandy Bridgeman / DANIEL SULLIVAN vs Nicholas Shin / Kahlo Vue6-4, 3-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTed Tubekis / Owen Priestley vs Masaki Nozawa / Tsuyoshi Yamazaki6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRory ODonnell / Jordan Federbush vs Yoichi Sumida / Akihiro Okumura6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDouglas Smith / DANIEL SULLIVAN vs KOHEI YAMAMOTO / Masanori Kobayashi4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesTed Tubekis / ROHIT SATISHCHANDRA vs Rafael Lozada / Carlos Flores5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRoy Koch vs Tyler Ko2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Boutell / Chester Choi vs Hazem Isawi / Michael Hong4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAlex Bok vs Ionut Rus2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDouglas Smith / Travis Gayles vs Jazz Burks / Derek Kaden1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJordan Federbush / Roy Koch vs David Isphording / Jason Richardson0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesROHIT SATISHCHANDRA vs Brian Green2-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesAlex Bok / Keith Boutell vs Beau Bigelow / Eric Lindberg6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDouglas Smith / Sebastian Ventura vs Anthony Noti / Kelcei Glasgow2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKeith Boutell / Travis Gayles vs ADITYA OBI / Emmett Johnson3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesROHIT SATISHCHANDRA vs Saverio Suraci7-6, 1-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChester Choi / Gabriel Garcia vs Omeed Zardkoohi / Brady Stein3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDANIEL SULLIVAN vs Bryant Beal1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Smith / Jordan Federbush vs Jay Guthmann / Peidi Wu6-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesROHIT SATISHCHANDRA / Rory ODonnell vs Luis Sanchez / Tim Brown6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKeith Boutell / Jordan Federbush vs Jerome Thymes / Vincent Thomas4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTravis Gayles / Gabriel Garcia vs Jon Stoper / Patrick Reichard3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJordan Federbush / Rory ODonnell vs Howard Hoff / Bruce Thornquist5-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJason Feldgreber vs Stefan Petrovic4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTravis Gayles / Keith Boutell vs Syed Jawad Gardezi / Khalil Ruknoddin5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesTed Tubekis / Saurab Bhargava vs David Grimm / Leo Kanev6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJason Feldgreber vs Julian Garcia3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesROHIT SATISHCHANDRA / Travis Gayles vs Nate Pualengco / Sameer Talcherkar7-5, 5-2
L#2 SinglesRandy Bridgeman vs John Simonetti2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKeith Boutell / Owen Priestley vs Bruce Caughran / Bill Leff6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesGabriel Garcia / Ted Tubekis vs Jeffrey Bartow / John Leubner4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesROHIT SATISHCHANDRA vs Zachary Cho4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Bok / Keith Boutell vs Christopher Darnielle / Jack Trager4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDarren Lubotsky / Douglas Smith vs Rick Aguayo / Benjamin Havlicek4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · CDTA ESL 18&O M 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 18&O M4.0 River Trails Ciuca Sat 8 $2281301542388
2CDTA E 18&O M4.0 XS Thymes Sat 6 $2263301537314
3CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Tam Aguayo Sat 1 $2263281738357
4CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Oak Brook Franzo Sun 7 $2063291639355
5CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Forest View Takahashi Sat 4 $2163261942371
6CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Tam Choi Sun 1 $2245222351384
7CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Naperville Podwika Sat 2 $2236202554409
8CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Wheaton Isphording Sun 2 $1736162964456
9CDTA E 18&O M4.0 MT Chi Brown Sun 12 $2827123367437
10CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Tam Kanev Sat 7 $2218113470443
11(DROPPED) CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Glenbrook Franks Sat 5 $25000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chester Choi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Daniel Michael
published 4
Gabriel Garcia
published 4
3.65
Jordan Federbush
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.53
Alex Bok
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.46
Keith Boutell
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ian Quinlan
published 3.5
3.15
Darren Lubotsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
DANIEL SULLIVAN
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jason Feldgreber
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Mario Encinas
published
Owen Priestley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
ROHIT SATISHCHANDRA
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Bridgeman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rory ODonnell
published
Roy Koch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Saurab Bhargava
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Williamson
published
Sebastian Ventura
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ted Tubekis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Travis Gayles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ted Tubekis + Owen Priestley5264% gamesnot enough data
Jordan Federbush + Keith Boutell044 matchesnot enough data
Keith Boutell + Darren Lubotsky044 matchesnot enough data
Chester Choi + Keith Boutell123 matchesnot enough data
Keith Boutell + Travis Gayles033 matchesnot enough data
Keith Boutell + Alex Bok123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chester Choi
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Daniel Michael
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Gabriel Garcia
3W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jordan Federbush
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Alex Bok
1W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Keith Boutell
80W–99L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Ian Quinlan
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Darren Lubotsky
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
DANIEL SULLIVAN
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Feldgreber
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mario Encinas
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Owen Priestley
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
ROHIT SATISHCHANDRA
5W–11L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Randy Bridgeman
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rory ODonnell
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roy Koch
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Saurab Bhargava
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Scott Williamson
17W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sebastian Ventura
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ted Tubekis
25W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Travis Gayles
3W–5L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.