Teams

Jimison (Edgewater)

2023 OWB Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesChristina Langford / Tina Phillips vs Sherri Marsteller / Kim Maddox7-6, 6-4
2023-12-11vs Khiem (Rosemary Beach)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrenda Nyberg / Tina Phillips vs Carlye Zaborski / Ashley Goyne1-6, 6-7
2023-11-19vs Patty (WaterSound)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Whittle / Tina Phillips vs Sherry Dennis / MISSY HANNAHAN6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesChristina Langford / Tina Phillips vs Julie Martin / Meg Castleberry1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-05vs Patty (WaterSound)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Nyberg / Tina Phillips vs Veronica Gray / Angie Gibson6-0, 7-6
2023-10-29vs Khiem (Rosemary Beach)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Nyberg / Tina Phillips vs Nora Cyr / LeAnne Shumate5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Tina Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Linda Sleeth
published
3.28
Leslie Casiple
published
Deanna Jimison
published 3.5
3.19
Iman Elkomy
published 3.5
3.18
Colleen Dietrich
published 3.5
3.12
Carrie Redd
published 3.5
3.06
2.94
Laura Heitzmann
published
2.76
Teri Cable
published
Kathy Harres
published
Kathy Lins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Casiple + Christina Langford224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Phillips
69W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Linda Sleeth
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
Leslie Casiple
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Deanna Jimison
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Iman Elkomy
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Colleen Dietrich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carrie Redd
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Christina Langford
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
Laura Heitzmann
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
Teri Cable
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Kathy Harres
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Lins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.