Teams

Jax Golf - Chiang

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

17 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-23vs Palencia - GaunttSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Valinho / Teresa Oliver vs Kimberly Maxwell / Lizett Oosthuizen3-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesRobin Boyles / Natalie Gettemy vs Sharon Luther / Susan McCarthy6-2, 6-2
2025-03-15vs Jax Beach Tennis Center - WatersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTeresa Oliver / Linda Valinho vs Tina Toomey / Manisha Valentin5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah O'Leary / Natalie Gettemy vs Carol Kelley / Mandy Shaffer3-6, 4-6
2025-03-02vs Baymeadows - GrayWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmelia Hernandez / Linda Valinho vs Elisabethe Lucien / Cindy Wilkinson6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeven Livingston / Natalie Gettemy vs Oksana Andersen / Kelly Bryant6-4, 6-2
2025-02-09vs Palencia - GaunttWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah O'Leary / Linda Valinho vs Anne Raha / Molly Moseley6-1, 7-5
2025-02-06vs Sawgrass - TobyLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeven Livingston / Linda Valinho vs Alicia Sprecher / Kim Gibson1-6, 1-6
2025-02-02vs Planet Swim - MorseSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Valinho / Melissa Carr vs Emily Pierson / Meghan Spencer3-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesKelly Bengermino / Natalie Gettemy vs Marissa Alex / Francine Serur6-2, 6-2
2025-01-12vs Deercreek - EliasonWon 20
W#2 DoublesLinda Valinho / Deborah O'Leary vs Jill Cole / Mildred Carrasquillo6-3, 6-1
W#4 DoublesRobin Boyles / Natalie Gettemy vs Jyothi Berman / Stacy Turner6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Andrea Mayer
published 3.5
3.44
Melissa Carr
published
3.41
Amelia Hernandez
published 3.5
3.31
Kelly Bengermino
published
3.27
Lisa Woods
published
3.27
Lauren M Baughman
published
Charleen Bearup
published 3.5
Deborah O'Leary
published 3.5
3.25
Teresa Oliver
published
3.25
Teya McDermand
published
3.21
Natalie Gettemy
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.20
Beven Livingston
published 3.5
3.18
Linda Valinho
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Kismet Miller
published
3.07
Mary Tice
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Susan Chiang
published
2.73
Allison Carbonneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Woods + Melissa Carr7069% games+14.0% vs expected
Andrea Mayer + Teresa Oliver5062% games+5.9% vs expected
Natalie Gettemy + Linda Valinho2453% gamesnot enough data
Linda Valinho + Susan Chiang3348% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Mayer + Melissa Carr303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Mayer
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Melissa Carr
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Amelia Hernandez
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
Kelly Bengermino
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Lisa Woods
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.27
Lauren M Baughman
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Charleen Bearup
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deborah O'Leary
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Oliver
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Teya McDermand
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Natalie Gettemy
48W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Beven Livingston
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Linda Valinho
92W–72L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Kismet Miller
15W–24L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Mary Tice
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Susan Chiang
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.74
3
Allison Carbonneau
6W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.