Teams

Abdin/Fayetteville/FAC

2024 Adult Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-09vs Smith/Matrix/MRCLost 12
W#1 SinglesJamal Abdin vs Tom Hubbard6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBill Stanton vs Drew Smith4-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesMarty Baker vs Frederick Hudspeth5-7, 4-6
2025-02-03vs Smith/Matrix/MRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesJP Kwas vs Drew Smith6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Ditmore vs Tom Hubbard2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJamal Abdin vs James Sperry6-2, 6-1
2025-01-25vs Smith/Matrix/MRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesMichael Overman vs Frederick Hudspeth7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRichard Keech vs Drew Smith6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMarty Baker vs Keith Landrum5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-25vs Smith/Matrix/MRCWon 30
W#1 SinglesBill Stanton vs Frederick Hudspeth6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMuhammad Leghari vs Tom Hubbard6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMichael Ditmore vs Keith Landrum6-2, 6-1
2024-11-21vs Smith/Matrix/MRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesRichard Keech vs James Sperry6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJamal Abdin vs Deric Neal6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMarty Baker vs Drew Smith7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-11-11vs Smith/Matrix/MRCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMichael Overman vs Tom Hubbard6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMuhammad Leghari vs Frederick Hudspeth6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJamal Abdin vs Drew Smith6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Michael Overman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.51
Richard Keech
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.50
Jamal Abdin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
JP Kwas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Bill Stanton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Muhammad Leghari
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.31
Marty Baker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Michael Ditmore
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Overman + Bill Stanton3252% gamesnot enough data
Michael Overman + Jamal Abdin224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Overman + Muhammad Leghari314 matchesnot enough data
Bill Stanton + Muhammad Leghari224 matchesnot enough data
Jamal Abdin + Muhammad Leghari123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Overman
31W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.63
Richard Keech
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Jamal Abdin
54W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
JP Kwas
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Bill Stanton
27W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
Muhammad Leghari
22W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.33
Marty Baker
27W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Michael Ditmore
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.