Teams

2024 Men's Captain Incentive Winners - 1 Free Registration

REGISTRATION HOLDING - VALID ONLY FOR 2025 SEASON · 2024 CAPTAINS INCENTIVE WINNERS - VALID ONLY 2025 SEASON

23 players · average NTRP 3.61 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 2024 CAPTAINS INCENTIVE WINNERS - VALID ONLY 2025 SEASON
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12024 Men's Captain Incentive Winners - 1 Free Registration000000
22024 Women's Captain Incentive Winners - 1 Free Registration000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Derek Niehus
published 5
4.30
Nick Salazar
published
4.21
Michael Easton
published
3.71
Rom van der Zee
published 4
3.65
Roger Freeman
published
3.63
Kevin Breault
published
3.62
Jeff Cline
published
3.62
Jason Broom
published
3.59
Patrick Reed
published 4
3.57
Robin Wick
published
3.51
Todd Madsen
published
3.48
Richard Plett
published 3.5
3.43
Mark Creek
published 3.5
Chuck Grablewski
published 3.5
3.02
Jason Gonzales
published
3.00
Jim Lord
published
2.87
John Wendt
published
2.79
Drake Busch
published 3
David VonGunten
published 3
2.42
Kriss Burwell
published 3
Mark Hutter
published
Matt Armentrout
published
Richard Hayes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Derek Niehus
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Salazar
50W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Michael Easton
20W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
4
Rom van der Zee
70W–57L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Roger Freeman
35W–19L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Kevin Breault
53W–45L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jeff Cline
24W–4L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.62
Jason Broom
28W–16L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Patrick Reed
58W–138L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Robin Wick
29W–32L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
Todd Madsen
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Richard Plett
161W–68L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Mark Creek
92W–67L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Chuck Grablewski
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Gonzales
61W–30L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Jim Lord
68W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
John Wendt
23W–24L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Drake Busch
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
David VonGunten
4W–36L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Kriss Burwell
23W–106L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Mark Hutter
48W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Armentrout
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Hayes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.