Teams

Parker - Columbia

2024 Columbia Adult Mixed 40 & Over League · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSOURI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-01vs Schmitz - ColumbiaLost 02
L#1 DoublesLea Brandt / John Wampler vs Katherine Jagger / Neil Schmitz2-6, 0-3
L#2 DoublesStephanie Womack / Reza Farid vs Julie Swain / Brock Jones1-6, 1-6
2024-07-30vs Schmitz - ColumbiaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Mehle / John Howe vs Julie Swain / Brock Jones4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Womack / Reza Farid vs Katherine Jagger / Mike Jagger7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-23vs Hodges - ColumbiaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLea Brandt / Ben Loeb vs Beverly Horvit / Christian Schwandtner2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Bohl / John Howe vs Kathy Hodges / Stan Jastrzebski3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Womack / Reza Farid vs Laurie Everett / Randy Picht0-6, 0-6
2024-07-09vs Schmitz - ColumbiaLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Parker / Reza Farid vs Karen Thies / Saul Mendoza2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLea Brandt / John Wampler vs Julie Swain / Brock Jones2-6, 1-6
2024-07-02vs Hodges - ColumbiaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Mehle / Ben Loeb vs Stan Jastrzebski / Cindy Crist6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesReza Farid / Stephanie Womack vs Laurie Everett / Kevin Everett1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Parker / John Howe vs Jon Stemmle / Kathy Hodges6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schmitz - Columbia5113514131
2Hodges - Columbia327816124
3Parker - Columbia0541123149

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kate Mehle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Lea Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.54
Stephanie Womack
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Sarah Bohl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ben Loeb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Howe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
John Wampler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Parker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Mehle
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
Lea Brandt
35W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.58
Stephanie Womack
21W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
Sarah Bohl
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Ben Loeb
3W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Howe
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Wampler
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Parker
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.