Teams

CV-Toscana/Sturdyvin

2023 CV Mixed Doubles 55 & Over - CV · CV Mixed Doubles 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-01vs LLW-CV-Deep Canyon/ZuckerWon 10
W#1 DoublesGarrett Mullen / Cynthia Mulflur vs Kathy McCann / Andy McGregor6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCharles Strazzara / Cynthia Mulflur vs Paul Blankenmeister / Linda Blankenmeister6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesGarrett Mullen / Lesley Jewell vs Jerry Kurtzweil / Molly Hilll3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesGarrett Mullen / Cynthia Mulflur vs Matt Amico / Maribeth Pullman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCharles Strazzara / Rebecca Bratlien vs Doreen Buchy / Roger Davis1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGarrett Mullen / Allison Alanis vs Jill Delaney / William Smyth3-6, 1-6
2023-01-21vs CV-Shadow Mountain/Lisa ButtjesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGarrett Mullen / Lesley Jewell vs Dan Gleadle / Lois Owens6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPaul Vidor / Rebecca Bratlien vs Dan Cunningham / Kelly Hess6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-01-07vs CV-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L GagnonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Ramsey / Rebecca Bratlien vs Catherine Petitti / Steve Breit2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
David Sturdyvin
published 4.5
3.40
Rebecca Bratlien
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Charles Strazzara
published 3.5
3.35
Garrett Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Cynthia Mulflur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
JANELL TESSLER
published
Kate Bontje
published
Nancy Chapman
published
Richard Ramsey
published
Taunja Feldman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garrett Mullen + JANELL TESSLER224 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Mulflur + Garrett Mullen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Sturdyvin
47W–34L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
Rebecca Bratlien
35W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Charles Strazzara
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Garrett Mullen
42W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Cynthia Mulflur
14W–39L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
JANELL TESSLER
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Bontje
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Chapman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Ramsey
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Taunja Feldman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.