Teams

CTL40/Beall/CTC

Mixed Doubles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Mixed 8.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Angie Rucker
published 4.5
3.95
Kevin Felkel
published
3.83
Andrew Kaczynski
published 4
3.81
Daniel Goolsby
published 4
3.79
Jenkins Mann
published
3.76
3.75
Michael Beall
published
3.63
Lisa Dahlquist
published
3.63
Monica Gaddis
published
3.62
Eugenia Hardwick
published
3.60
Catherine Lesser
published 4
3.58
Kathy Foster
published
3.53
Dana Burke
published 4
3.52
Barry Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Jeremy Pow
published
3.29
Karen Thompson
published
3.21
Amy Beall
published 4
Michael Guffee
published
Michael Pordes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Beall + Michael Beall1449% gamesnot enough data
Amy Beall + Daniel Goolsby213 matchesnot enough data
Monica Gaddis + Kevin Felkel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Rucker
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.32
Kevin Felkel
79W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Andrew Kaczynski
45W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Daniel Goolsby
39W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Jenkins Mann
65W–40L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amanda Willoughby
37W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Michael Beall
32W–39L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Lisa Dahlquist
60W–36L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Monica Gaddis
49W–39L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Eugenia Hardwick
52W–59L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Catherine Lesser
77W–72L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
Kathy Foster
68W–50L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.58
4
Dana Burke
61W–28L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Barry Mathews
212W–65L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Jeremy Pow
23W–18L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Karen Thompson
78W–63L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.29
4
Amy Beall
63W–37L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.21
Michael Guffee
52W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Pordes
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.