Teams

Serve It Up

2022 DC WTA Adult 40 & Over Winter · DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-12vs Chip N ChargeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Crozet / Daren Bakst vs Brian Lynch / Travis Langenkamp0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesRaymond Barry vs Florin Iancu3-6, 0-6
2022-03-05vs Chip N ChargeLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaren Bakst / Mark Crozet vs Fabrizio Cariani / Jason Olson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Tice / Bret Traw vs Travis Langenkamp / James Rowe4-6, 2-6
2022-02-13vs Chip N ChargeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Crozet / Daren Bakst vs Christopher Graves / Jason Olson2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Tice vs Florin Iancu1-6, 1-6
2022-02-12vs Chip N ChargeLost 02
L#1 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Shawn Drury6-7, 5-6
L#2 DoublesMark Crozet / Raymond Barry vs Brian Lynch / Brian Stanley4-6, 5-6
2022-02-05vs Chip N ChargeLost 02
L#1 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Shawn Drury3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Barry / Bret Traw vs Matthew Warren / Marc Schoeni2-6, 0-6
2022-01-29vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#2 DoublesRaymond Barry / Samuel Ryan vs Brian Stanley / Marc Schoeni6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-01-22vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Crozet / Samuel Ryan vs James Rowe / Andy Bressler1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Samuel Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Bret Traw
published 3.5
Daren Bakst
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Raymond Barry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Borne MacE
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samuel Ryan
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Bret Traw
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Daren Bakst
15W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Raymond Barry
2W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Borne MacE
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.