Teams

Ta.Gonzalez-Borsuk18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-05vs El.Sanchez18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesGillian Sellick / Susan Hill vs Ramona Holdstock / Ashley Vaughan6-2, 6-4
2023-09-21vs Ja.Ritchey18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesMeghan Rider / Susan Hill vs Anne Free / Kimberley Matthews6-1, 6-2
2023-09-14vs Am.Pena18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Johnson / Meghan Rider vs Sharon Baggett / Alissa Hennen0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Couto / Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk vs Kim von Weihe / Erin Swindell4-6, 4-6
2023-09-07vs Kr.Sobey18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Nguyen / Gillian Sellick vs Christie Hartinger / Kristin Rice6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMeghan Rider / Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-25vs Ly.Manweiler18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenny Nguyen / Carrie Couto vs Molly Briggs / Heather Mittag1-6, 1-6
2023-08-24vs Ch.Watson18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesCary Brege / Gillian Sellick vs Nancy Andersen / Hallie Shinn4-6, 3-6
2023-08-03vs He.Williams18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Johnson / Meghan Rider vs Louisa Garvey / Brette Best7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Gillian Sellick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.99
Susan Hill
published
3.94
Jenny Nguyen
published
3.84
Connie Peterson
published 4
3.64
Meghan Rider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Cary Brege
published 4
3.59
Carrie Couto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.22
3.15
Heidi Sloan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Nguyen + Gillian Sellick5163% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Nguyen + Susan Hill123 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Rider + Gillian Sellick303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hill + Gillian Sellick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gillian Sellick
119W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.04
Susan Hill
20W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.99
Jenny Nguyen
23W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Connie Peterson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Meghan Rider
341W–169L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cary Brege
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Carrie Couto
162W–176L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.59
Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Heidi Sloan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.