Teams

No Strings Attached

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 7.0 - 55 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-18vs Montana RacqueteersLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila Schaub / Dawn Schwartz vs Hiroko Yerkey / Sherry Varner1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Larson / Patrisha Crisp vs Rebecca Jasmine / Terri Ruthruff1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Wilcox / Gail Nutting vs Mary Thane / Kathleen McIver2-6, 0-6
2021-06-18vs 55 Shades of GreyLost 12
W#1 DoublesGail Nutting / Patti Danforth vs Sandrah MacK / Judy Klein6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Larsen / Dawn Schwartz vs Karen Spierling / Joanne Brekjern4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Wilcox / Nancy Larson vs Cathy Lower / Patrice Jackson1-6, 0-6
2021-06-17vs Aces HighLost 01
L#3 DoublesSheila Schaub / Patrisha Crisp vs Arianna Whitman / Mary Harris2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 - 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Becky Wilcox
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Dawn Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.49
Patrisha Crisp
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Diane Larsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gail Nutting
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Patti Danforth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Schaub
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrisha Crisp + Nancy Larson044 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Schwartz + Sheila Schaub123 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Schwartz + Becky Wilcox123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Wilcox
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Dawn Schwartz
7W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
2.5
Patrisha Crisp
14W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%54%46%
2.49
Diane Larsen
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Gail Nutting
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Larson
0W–13L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patti Danforth
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Sheila Schaub
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.