Teams

ABoone-TOCH

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Eve

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Ephesus Park Tennis Courts
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Ephesus Park Tennis Courts
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
2026-09-08vs MMcCullough-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Boone / Kait Mckee vs Amanda Klein / Sarah Johnston6-7, 1-1
L#2 DoublesJudith Mapstone / Dana Crotts vs Annaliese Gresham / Amanda Laird3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshleigh White / Jaime Detzi vs Megan McCullough / Leslie Unroe1-6, 2-6
2026-08-20vs EPatulski-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Crotts / Meredith Bazemore vs Emily Patulski / Katie Helms2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHanna Porter / Kait Mckee vs Ni Zhang / Ruitian Yan4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshleigh White / Holly Baker vs Kellie Johnson / Susanne Schmal1-6, 3-6
2026-08-13vs MMcCullough-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeredith Bazemore / Dana Crotts vs Amanda Laird / Susan Kim6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJaime Detzi / Jennifer Bowman vs Kristen Anderson / Annaliese Gresham2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Baker / Angela Boone vs Megan McCullough / Athena Samaras1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Meredith Bazemore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.26
Dana Crotts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jaime Detzi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
Holly Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Hanna Porter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Megan Prieto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Julie Roland
published
2.10
Judith Mapstone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.92
Ashleigh White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.91
Kait Mckee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kait Mckee + Hanna Porter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Meredith Bazemore
25W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Dana Crotts
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Jaime Detzi
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Holly Baker
0W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Hanna Porter
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Megan Prieto
13W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Julie Roland
7W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Judith Mapstone
0W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Ashleigh White
0W–15L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Kait Mckee
4W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Jennifer Bowman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.