Teams

SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Nguyen

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · SD - Women - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Webster000000
2SD 4.0 Balboa TC/ Davis000000
3SD 4.0 Barnes TC/ Bucky000000
4SD 4.0 Barnes TC/ Gambale000000
5SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Nguyen000000
6SD 4.0 Peninsula TC/ Lightner000000
7SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Kauffman000000
8SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Hanson000000
9SD 4.0 Universiy City RC/ Fitzgerald000000
10SD 4.0 Coronado HS/ Hammond000000
11SD 4.0 Barnes TC/ Carey000000
12SD 4.0 Barnes / Williams000000
13SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Fairbank000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
KhanhLinh Nguyen
published 4
3.91
Maru Vega
published
3.89
Meg Dawson
published 4
3.88
Miho Nakajima
published 4
3.78
Clara Huerta
published 4
3.74
Guadalupe Garcia
published
3.73
Brandy Baray
published 4
3.68
3.58
Veronica Ruffo
published 4
3.56
Inge Bisconer
published 4
3.48
3.39
Silvia Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KhanhLinh Nguyen + Meg Dawson5060% games+12.3% vs expected
Miho Nakajima + KhanhLinh Nguyen10559% games+2.8% vs expected
Veronica Ruffo + Brandy Baray6846% gamesnot enough data
Brandy Baray + Guadalupe Garcia404 matchesnot enough data
KhanhLinh Nguyen + Guadalupe Garcia404 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Ruffo + Guadalupe Garcia033 matchesnot enough data
Miho Nakajima + Brandy Baray123 matchesnot enough data
Meg Dawson + Karina Ortiz-Franco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
KhanhLinh Nguyen
98W–42L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Maru Vega
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Meg Dawson
64W–55L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Miho Nakajima
88W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Clara Huerta
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Guadalupe Garcia
19W–17L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Brandy Baray
113W–102L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Veronica Romero-Ramirez
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Veronica Ruffo
135W–157L career · no lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.58
4
Inge Bisconer
38W–41L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Karina Ortiz-Franco
14W–14L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Silvia Rodriguez
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.