Teams

Ry.Sheppard18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-30vs Ma.Roschel18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesGabriel Iocco vs Marcelo Roschel7-5, 7-5
2026-07-09vs Na.Wireback18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichael Weslander vs Daniel Grassinger6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesScott Scarneo vs Taylor Atherton7-6, 6-3
2026-07-02vs Sp.Johnson18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesJeron Russell vs Stephen Marley6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesScott Scarneo vs William Anderson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesGabriel Iocco vs Hanzhang Liu6-0, 6-1
2026-06-27vs Ca.Pena18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesJeron Russell vs Seb Heese4-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs Ma.Roschel18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesScott Scarneo vs Brendon Dorgan7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJeron Russell vs Marcelo Roschel6-4, 6-3
2026-06-04vs Na.Wireback18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesMichael Weslander vs Andrew Chan6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJeron Russell vs Joseph Hollingsworth6-2, 6-0
2026-05-28vs Sp.Johnson18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Glenn vs Austen Berry6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesScott Scarneo vs Austin Ness6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ry.Sheppard18S6117412149
2Ca.Pena18S4313817158
3Na.Wireback18S3371124167
4Sp.Johnson18S2461227182
5Ma.Roschel18S1551326180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Michael Weslander
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.94
Matthew Glenn
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.93
Jeron Russell
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.82
Gabriel Iocco
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.80
Scott Scarneo
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeron Russell + Michael Weslander224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Weslander
214W–93L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Matthew Glenn
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Jeron Russell
142W–90L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Gabriel Iocco
118W–116L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Scott Scarneo
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.