Teams

MD.Rawls

2023 CTRL Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrooke Rawls / Bobby Rawls vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-16vs APEX.ArithotiLost 02
L#2 DoublesBobby Rawls / Brooke Rawls vs Purish Kumar / Teresa Ling2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrinette Myers / Brent Myers vs Sandeep Sharma / Sally Kennedy0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-16vs TOC.TerjesenLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Kell / Andy Kell vs Betsy Terjesen / Steven Cataldo1-6, 2-6
2023-07-15vs APEX.ArithotiLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrooke Rawls / Bobby Rawls vs Sandeep Sharma / Gigi Martin2-6, 2-6
2023-07-07vs TOC.TerjesenLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristi-Ann Wiltberger / Robert Wiltberger vs Chrissy Morgan / Douglas Washabaugh2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrinette Myers / Brent Myers vs Devon Wadsworth / Ben Desonglo1-6, 0-6
2023-06-24vs APEX.ArithotiLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Rawls / Bobby Rawls vs Vanessa Garrido / Muthuraj Krishnan3-6, 3-6
2023-06-11vs TOC.TerjesenLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristi-Ann Wiltberger / Robert Wiltberger vs Stephen Fu / Andrea Desonglo1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrinette Myers / Brent Myers vs LuAnn Eyerman / Douglas Washabaugh1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Kell / Andy Kell vs Steven Cataldo / Chrissy Morgan3-6, 0-6
2023-06-03vs APEX.ArithotiWon 20
W#1 DoublesBobby Rawls / Brooke Rawls vs Arun Prakash / Lisa Marshall6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Wiltberger / Christi-Ann Wiltberger vs Yuvaraj Vivekanandan / Vanessa Garrido6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Amy Kell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.10
Brooke Rawls
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Colleen Davis
published 3.5
2.87
Bobby Rawls
published 3
2.80
Christi-Ann Wiltberger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Brinette Myers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Robert Wiltberger
published
2.45
Sheridan Orr
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Kell
185W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Brooke Rawls
196W–121L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Colleen Davis
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Bobby Rawls
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Christi-Ann Wiltberger
61W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Brinette Myers
92W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Robert Wiltberger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
Sheridan Orr
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%63%37%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.