Teams

Sarasota/Risquez/50&Over7.5M

2023 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 7.5 M Wednesday Eve

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-08vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesGustavo Risquez / James Protigal vs Kenneth Schwartz / Jack Rodman6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Cliff Menezes vs David Rosenberg / Mike Beasley7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2023-11-01vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesNader Massoumi / Peter Laughlin vs David Rosenberg / Joe Malave7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdward Bok / Gustavo Risquez vs Bradley Sutter / Tim Mihm7-6, 6-3
2023-10-25vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Edward Bok vs Kenneth Schwartz / Grover Windsor6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Nader Massoumi vs Tim Mihm / Joe Malave7-5, 6-0
2023-10-23vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 7.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Cliff Menezes vs Dave Barcomb / Joe Malave5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Edward Bok vs David Rosenberg / Jack Rodman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-18vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesNader Massoumi / Peter Laughlin vs Mike Beasley / Kenneth Schwartz6-0, 6-2
2023-10-04vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Edward Bok vs Kenneth Schwartz / Jack Rodman6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Scott Temple vs DONALD LAGASSE / Joe Malave3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-09-27vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Scott Temple vs Tim Mihm / Bradley Sutter6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Wednesday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Gustavo Risquez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.77
Kent Perry
published
3.72
Peter Laughlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Kip Schoonover
published
3.66
Ron Forzani
published
3.57
Nader Massoumi
published
3.31
Scott Temple
published
3.23
James Protigal
published 3.5
William Rhodes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Laughlin + Gustavo Risquez2450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–175L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Kent Perry
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Peter Laughlin
76W–44L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Kip Schoonover
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Ron Forzani
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Nader Massoumi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Scott Temple
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
James Protigal
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
William Rhodes
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.