Teams

KY/LOU/MCCOY

2025 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER · 4.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-02vs KY/LOU/BURNETTLost 12
W#1 SinglesSeth Gannon vs Patrick Burnett7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTopaz Prawito vs Cruz Mario Aguero5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAbraham O'Coffey vs Jason Rice6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-21Won 30
W#1 SinglesDarnell McCoy vs Jose Ortiz6-1
W#2 SinglesTopaz Prawito vs David Wagner6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTom Gondoly vs Clay Watkins6-0, 6-3
2025-08-13vs KY/LOU/BURNETTWon 30
W#1 SinglesDarnell McCoy vs Joshua Rose6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBen Hinds vs Patrick Burnett6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAbraham O'Coffey vs Clay Cauley6-1, 6-4
2025-08-04Won 30
W#1 SinglesSeth Gannon vs Zachary Allen6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBen Hinds vs David Wagner6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTopaz Prawito vs Clay Watkins6-2, 6-2
2025-07-23vs KY/LOU/BURNETTWon 21
W#1 SinglesJohn Grunzinger vs Thomas Jones6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSeth Gannon vs Cruz Mario Aguero6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesTopaz Prawito vs Clay Cauley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-07Won 30
W#1 SinglesAbraham O'Coffey vs Jose Ortiz6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBen Hinds vs David Wagner6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesTom Gondoly vs Clay Watkins6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Topaz Prawito
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.68
Tom Gondoly
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.66
Christopher Duke
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Seth Gannon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Abraham O'Coffey
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Darnell McCoy
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.58
Ben Hinds
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
John Grunzinger
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darnell McCoy + Ben Hinds5069% games+5.8% vs expected
Christopher Duke + Darnell McCoy3449% games−1.2% vs expected
Topaz Prawito + Darnell McCoy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Topaz Prawito
18W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Tom Gondoly
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Christopher Duke
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Seth Gannon
16W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Abraham O'Coffey
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Darnell McCoy
58W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Ben Hinds
41W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
John Grunzinger
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.