Teams

STSC-Reid-Brown

2024 ADULT 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-15vs ESTC-YangLost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Branch / Joshua Barnett vs Jon Eschrich / Brandon Montagna0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGrigoriy Brikez / Liam Rutherford vs Edmund Yang / Joseph Huynh0-6, 1-6
2024-06-01vs S OR-ACB-AndersonLost 13
W#1 DoublesCorey Brown / Todd Branch vs Robb Schotthoefer / Travis Anderson6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJoshua Barnett vs Kenyon Neuman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Reid / Ed Groenhout vs Corey Weathers / David Vodak4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLiam Rutherford / Grigoriy Brikez vs Dustin Shively / Garrett Kaye3-6, 2-6
2024-05-19vs ESTC-YangLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Branch / Corey Brown vs Cory Stores / Eric Welch4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Bradshaw / Joshua Barnett vs Jon Eschrich / Joe Potter2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Brown / Liam Rutherford vs Greg OHanlon / Joseph Huynh0-6, 2-6
2024-05-18vs EYMCA-You Might Catch an AddictionLost 13
L#1 DoublesTodd Branch / Matthew Reid vs David Chihorek / Thomas Joyce3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGrigoriy Brikez / Corey Brown vs John Falzone / Mark Walker7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLiam Rutherford vs Zach Glauber2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Freres / William Brown vs Brady Lightle / Joseph Santos3-6, 3-6
2024-05-11vs TTC-GerkeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoshua Barnett / John Bradshaw vs AJ Millet / Jason Lin2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGrigoriy Brikez / Corey Brown vs Mark Szabo / Drew Gerkey7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLiam Rutherford / Todd Branch vs Miguel Angel Trejo Romo / Charles Goldman4-6, 1-6
2024-04-28vs TTC-GerkeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Branch / Corey Brown vs Drew Gerkey / Jason Lin6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Brown / Liam Rutherford vs Ross Ruecker / Mark Szabo2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJoshua Barnett / John Bradshaw vs Miguel Angel Trejo Romo / Charles Goldman4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-21vs ACB-Anderson 4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJoshua Barnett / Johnny Hon vs Michael Lee / Robert Barnhart6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTodd Branch / Corey Brown vs Steve Coplin / Jackson Foster6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWilliam Brown / Liam Rutherford vs James Perkins / Guy Neal7-6, 6-3
2024-04-20vs S OR-ACB-AndersonLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Branch / Corey Brown vs David Vodak / Garrett Kaye5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJoshua Barnett / Johnny Hon vs Corey Weathers / Ryan Abbott1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLiam Rutherford vs Kenyon Neuman1-6, 1-6
2024-03-30vs EYMCA-You Might Catch an AddictionLost 04
L#1 DoublesTodd Branch / Cooper Brown vs David Chihorek / Thomas Joyce6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLiam Rutherford / Grigoriy Brikez vs Brady Lightle / Kaden Baker1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Bradshaw vs Joseph Santos5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoshua Barnett / Johnny Hon vs Zach Glauber / Connor Nolan0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESTC-Yang73351537334
2EYMCA-You Might Catch an Addiction73311946416
3STSC-Reid-Brown36123369491
4TTC-Gerkey37222860453
5ACB-Anderson 4.00963981515

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Corey Brown
published 4
Kyle Freres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ed Groenhout
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Grigoriy Brikez
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
John Bradshaw
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Johnny Hon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Joshua Barnett
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Liam Rutherford
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Todd Branch
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
William Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Johnny Hon + Joshua Barnett5549% gamesnot enough data
Corey Brown + John Bradshaw033 matchesnot enough data
John Bradshaw + Joshua Barnett123 matchesnot enough data
Liam Rutherford + Grigoriy Brikez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corey Brown
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Kyle Freres
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ed Groenhout
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Grigoriy Brikez
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Bradshaw
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Johnny Hon
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joshua Barnett
9W–17L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Liam Rutherford
1W–11L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Branch
12W–24L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Brown
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.