Teams

GarretsonD/MH/Reb

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-01-14vs Jedlicka/LR/LRACLost 12
W#1 SinglesJennifer Fielding vs Tiffani Jedlicka6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichele Stearns vs Jennifer Quilao2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMadeline Donahue vs Emily Keathley1-6, 0-6
2024-12-16vs Jedlicka/LR/LRACLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmanda Crowley vs Jennifer Quilao5-7, 2-5
W#2 SinglesHannah Heffernan vs Tiffani Jedlicka2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDeanna Garretson vs Emily Keathley0-6, 3-6
2024-11-14vs DGarretson/MH/BPWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennifer Fielding vs Rebecca Kinworthy6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMichele Stearns vs Yun Young4-6, 5-0
W#3 SinglesTess Bradford vs Heather Mainord7-5, 6-4
2024-11-06vs Jones/LR/PVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesMichele Stearns vs Eden Raines0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMadeline Donahue vs Courtney Jones0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesDeanna Garretson vs Michele Brewer1-6, 3-6
2024-10-29vs Jedlicka/LR/LRACLost 12
W#1 SinglesJennifer Fielding vs Jennifer Quilao6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTess Bradford vs Tiffani Jedlicka1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMadeline Donahue vs Marisa Cahill4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Hannah Heffernan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.67
Jennifer Fielding
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.62
Amanda Crowley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.49
Michele Stearns
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.45
Tess Bradford
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.38
Deanna Garretson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Madeline Donahue
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Garretson + Michele Stearns123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Heffernan
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Jennifer Fielding
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Amanda Crowley
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Michele Stearns
10W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
Tess Bradford
16W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Deanna Garretson
22W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Madeline Donahue
29W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.