Teams

7-JLockhead-HR

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men-Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-11vs 3-KRosenkrantz-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Lockhead / Lance Long vs Christopher Conover / Kurt Rosenkrantz6-3, 7-6
2022-05-02vs 4-WJohnson-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Lockhead / Neil McElroy vs David Stefan / Jeffrey Szafran5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-25vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCALost 01
L#2 DoublesBruce Gitter / John Lockhead vs Edward Bernier / Rob McKinnie1-6, 1-6
2022-04-20vs 1-TAikawa-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesDoug Cleary / Carl Laird vs Dan Tudor / Mark Higuchi5-7, 1-6
2022-04-11vs 5-PBream-UNCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Lacy / John Lockhead vs Michael Meyers / Tim Mounce7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLance Long vs Patrick Vernon3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDoug Cleary / Carl Laird vs Vincent Illiano / Derek Saccoccio6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-10vs 1-TAikawa-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Lockhead / Neil McElroy vs Terrence Tan / Wendell Gilland1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarl Laird / Jerry Roberts vs Bob Stocking / Scott Williams1-6, 3-6
2022-04-04vs 3-KRosenkrantz-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Lacy / Lance Long vs Robert Kern / Christopher Conover6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDoug Cleary / Carl Laird vs James Bohanek / Erik Milz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-28vs 4-WJohnson-HSWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Kennedy / John Lockhead vs David Stefan / Dave Thomas6-3, 6-0
2022-03-09vs 6-DEmmett-CHTCWon 20
W#1 SinglesLance Long vs Mitch Kleiman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Lockhead / Stephen Kennedy vs Richard Goldberg / Gary James6-4, 6-3
2022-03-08vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCAWon 10
W#3 DoublesE Clarke Gay / Carl Laird vs Edward Bernier / Mark McCullough4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Noah Huffman
published
3.27
Lance Long
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Tom Petersen
published
3.07
Stephen Kennedy
published
2.96
John Lockhead
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.84
Carl Laird
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Neil McElroy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Lockhead + Lance Long213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noah Huffman
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
3.5
Lance Long
72W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Tom Petersen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Stephen Kennedy
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
John Lockhead
51W–54L career · 7 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Carl Laird
42W–77L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Neil McElroy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.