Teams

SKY BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-13vs BP BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesBarry Permut / Gary Wussow vs Guerin Green / David Carrasco2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-06-06vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Wussow / Correy Jones vs Jim Burgert / Farhad Noorbakhsh2-6, 0-6
2024-05-30vs DTC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Eby / Gary Wussow vs Anthony Kay / Wayne Schell6-4, 6-4
2024-05-23vs MC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatt Moon / Gary Wussow vs Tim Lennek / Mark Phillips5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCorrey Jones / Jim Eby vs Stuart Adams / Brian Macke4-6, 4-6
2024-05-16vs CP BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesBarry Permut / Gary Wussow vs Daniel Aguilar / Glenn Junik4-6, 5-7
2024-05-02vs CACM REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngus Campbell / Jim Eby vs Jerry Barnhill / Patrick Broe7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Matt Moon
published
Barry Permut
published 3.5
3.16
Correy Jones
published 3.5
3.11
Jim Eby
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Angus Campbell
published 3.5
2.99
Gary Wussow
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.98
John Toaspern
published
Ken McLagan
published
Terry Staples
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Toaspern + Angus Campbell6453% games+0.7% vs expected
Terry Staples + Barry Permut7652% games−3.0% vs expected
Gary Wussow + Angus Campbell5645% games−4.2% vs expected
Terry Staples + Gary Wussow2636% gamesnot enough data
Terry Staples + Ken McLagan2438% gamesnot enough data
Terry Staples + Angus Campbell044 matchesnot enough data
Jim Eby + Gary Wussow134 matchesnot enough data
John Toaspern + Ken McLagan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Moon
26W–77L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Barry Permut
15W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Correy Jones
28W–45L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Jim Eby
25W–34L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Angus Campbell
39W–39L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Gary Wussow
32W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
John Toaspern
17W–27L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Ken McLagan
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Staples
11W–25L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.