Teams

LWR 18 Evening

2026 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over Winter Weeknight · 4.0 W Thursday Eve

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-20vs SARASOTA/RosenthalWon 41
L#1 DoublesChristine Handel / Nia Esposito vs Cindi Gomez / Courtney Rosenthal1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Naramore vs Elizabeth Rudisill7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNanelle Rosales / Svetlana Janglin vs Carla Rodman / Alicia Cohler6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Debbie Crowley3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Rain / Karen Spiegel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-11vs TPC Windsor 18 4.0Won 50
W#1 DoublesNia Esposito / Svetlana Janglin vs Kathy Sawyer / Brittany Blackman6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLaura Naramore vs Linda Radovich6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKathy Rain / Celia Pena vs Elizabeth Mahoney / Roberta Smith6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Gabriella Vayshelboym7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Melissa Stevens / Cheryl Lyn6-2, 6-3
2026-02-26vs SARASOTA/RosenthalLost 23
W#1 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Christine Handel vs Jennifer Stroble / Susan Scarlett6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Debbie Crowley6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Karen Spiegel vs Cindy Rosenberg / Carla Rodman4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLaura Naramore vs Elizabeth Rudisill6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarcia Frost / Betty Jo Zeigler vs Coquina Homer / Keely Crosby1-6, 3-6
2026-02-19vs River Strand RalleycatsWon 41
W#1 DoublesNia Esposito / Svetlana Janglin vs Kara Beene / Nancy Finman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Naramore vs Jodie Wang6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Handel / Natalie Bloch vs Emily Franklin / Annmarie Curle6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCelia Pena vs Kristen Keyser3-6, 1-2
W#3 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Nanelle Rosales vs Kristen Weston / Barbara Aichinger3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-12vs TPC Windsor 18 4.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Christine Handel vs Ann Davy / Cheryl Lyn6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Linda Radovich1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Huffman / Nanelle Rosales vs Fabiola Beckmann / Lisa Temple6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesBetty Jo Zeigler vs Elizabeth Mahoney3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Kathy Rain vs Nicole Thompson / Brittany Blackman6-3, 7-5
2026-02-05vs River Strand RalleycatsWon 32
W#1 DoublesNia Esposito / Karen Spiegel vs Nancy Finman / Kim Reiser4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Susanne Booth6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Rain / Sue Silberbusch vs Kristen Keyser / Kristen Weston5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Sheryl Eckert7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Celia Pena vs Emily Franklin / Annmarie Curle6-7, 1-6
2026-01-22vs TPC Windsor 18 4.0Won 41
W#1 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Christine Handel vs Ann Davy / Michelle McGrath6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Linda Radovich3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Larkin / Sue Silberbusch vs Roberta Smith / Melissa Stevens7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Polina Windsor6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Spiegel / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Fabiola Beckmann / Kathy Sawyer6-2, 6-0
2026-01-15vs SARASOTA/RosenthalLost 23
L#1 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Natalie Bloch vs Cindi Gomez / Cindy Rosenberg4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCelia Pena vs Jennifer Stroble1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNia Esposito / Lauren Larkin vs Tanya Keith / Yudi Carpenter6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAndrea Nathan vs Kim Marsella6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSue Silberbusch / Kathy Rain vs Courtney Rosenthal / Emily Weitekamp1-6, 3-6
2026-01-08vs River Strand RalleycatsLost 14
W#1 DoublesKaren Spiegel / Svetlana Janglin vs Kim Reiser / Kara Beene3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNanelle Rosales vs Kristen Keyser6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Larkin / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Annmarie Curle / Emily Franklin4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesBetty Jo Zeigler vs Susanne Booth4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarcia Frost / Celia Pena vs Barbara Aichinger / Judi Wilson5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Thursday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Nia Esposito
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Natalie Bloch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.87
Christine Handel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Andrea Nathan
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
3.80
Lauren Feingold Navas
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.80
Karen Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Nanelle Rosales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.80
Laura Naramore
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.79
Sue Silberbusch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Lauren Larkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Svetlana Janglin
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
3.71
Kathy Rain
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Karen Spiegel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Betty Jo Zeigler
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Celia Pena
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.42
Marcia Frost
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nia Esposito + Christine Handel6163% games+8.7% vs expected
Nia Esposito + Natalie Bloch8457% games+8.3% vs expected
Svetlana Janglin + Nia Esposito9457% games+2.7% vs expected
Svetlana Janglin + Kathy Rain5065% gamesnot enough data
Nia Esposito + Karen Spiegel314 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Bloch + Christine Handel404 matchesnot enough data
Sue Silberbusch + Kathy Rain123 matchesnot enough data
Celia Pena + Svetlana Janglin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nia Esposito
154W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Natalie Bloch
57W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Christine Handel
26W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Andrea Nathan
23W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Lauren Feingold Navas
77W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Karen Huffman
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Nanelle Rosales
84W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Sue Silberbusch
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
Lauren Larkin
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Kathy Rain
91W–94L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Karen Spiegel
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Betty Jo Zeigler
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Celia Pena
68W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.61
Marcia Frost
22W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.