Teams

Everything Bagels 7.0

2023 Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2023-04-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesXenia Baranova / Mario Olivero-Cabrera vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-01Won 20
W#2 DoublesPatcharavalai Lawhcharoen / Hsuan Ou vs Yvette Chisholm / Terry Moore6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDenese Cavanaugh / Brian Bichy vs Simone Velvel / Charles Kelly6-0, 6-1
2023-03-29vs Tennis FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Jones / Brian Bichy vs Zoie Acadia / Surendra Babu6-1, 6-0
2023-03-24Won 20
W#2 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Brian Bichy vs Jill Herscot / Jose Leary6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelsey Forbes / Austin Visk vs Kyley McGeeney / Christopher Garlock6-0, 6-0
2023-03-17vs New WavesLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnto Faini / James Forbes vs Shuang Chen / Li Tang2-6, 5-7
2023-03-13vs ServivorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesXenia Baranova / Austin Visk vs Gay Trinkner / Douglas Lee6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnto Faini / Kominh Thongphok vs Emily Barry / Jose Miguel Sacin6-3, 6-4
2023-03-09vs Title IXsWon 20
W#2 DoublesPatcharavalai Lawhcharoen / Hsuan Ou vs Catherine Donaldson / Mark Lavoie6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDenese Cavanaugh / Brian Bichy vs Simone Velvel / Terry Moore6-0, 6-0
2023-02-27vs Tennis FunLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnto Faini / Kominh Thongphok vs Juan Jose Tijero / Yaru Song3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesXenia Baranova / Praveen Jayakumar vs Christopher Grant / Jennifer Mitchell3-6, 2-6
2023-02-23vs Mixed ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesXenia Baranova / Mario Olivero-Cabrera vs Penelope Bell / Simon Linder4-6, 1-6
2023-02-13vs New WavesWon 10
W#2 DoublesXenia Baranova / Mario Olivero-Cabrera vs Zhuang Miao / Lydia Juh6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2023-02-06vs ServivorsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Bichy / Karen Jones vs Brenda Kaechele / Johnny Yataco6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKelsey Forbes / Hsuan Ou vs Douglas Lee / Gay Trinkner4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-02-01vs Title IXsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelsey Forbes / Hsuan Ou vs Yvette Chisholm / Tim McNamara6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDenese Cavanaugh / Mike James vs Catherine Donaldson / Richard McKeon6-3, 6-1
2023-01-28vs Tennis FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Jones / Brian Bichy vs Ann-Lee Chen / Christopher Grant6-3, 6-2
2023-01-20vs Mixed ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnto Faini / James Forbes vs Sorina Eftim / Matt Baumann6-2, 7-5
2023-01-12vs New WavesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMario Olivero-Cabrera / Xenia Baranova vs Zheng Dong / Jing Gu6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnto Faini / Brian Bichy vs Shuang Chen / Li Tang7-5, 2-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Brian Bichy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.91
Xenia Baranova
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
Christopher Lee
published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
published
3.66
Anto Faini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.61
Kirah Yen
published
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
published 3.5
3.54
James Forbes
published
3.51
3.40
Bill Hartman
published 3.5
3.34
Hsuan Ou
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.30
Erin Newsome Moltz
published
Austin Visk
published 3.5
2.90
Denese Cavanaugh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Jones
published
Kominh Thongphok
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Thongphok + Brian Bichy6164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Bichy
170W–103L career · 10 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Xenia Baranova
204W–68L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Christopher Lee
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Kelsey Forbes
140W–112L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
Jelena Mitrovic
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Anto Faini
226W–104L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.66
Kirah Yen
39W–29L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
276W–124L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.56
James Forbes
24W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.54
Mario Olivero-Cabrera
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Bill Hartman
35W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Hsuan Ou
184W–78L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Erin Newsome Moltz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.30
3.5
Austin Visk
29W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Denese Cavanaugh
147W–104L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
Karen Jones
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kominh Thongphok
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.