Teams

TIBURON PEN C CW5.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 5.5

18 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Adriana Mason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Melissa Feagin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Jena Watson
published
2.85
Connie Gove
published 3
2.82
Jessica Etchevers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Abby Hoffman
published 3
2.72
Kimberly Chen
published
2.70
Summer Singh
published
2.68
Marisa McArthur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Tanja Ross
published
2.58
Lana Burstein
published
2.54
Michelle Thomsen
published
2.54
2.54
Elizabeth Cha
published
2.49
Shannan Bishop
published
2.32
Linda Knauer
published
2.31
Janine Braun
published
2.16
Bodil Arlander
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanja Ross + Jessica Etchevers224 matchesnot enough data
Abby Hoffman + Adriana Mason404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adriana Mason
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Melissa Feagin
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Jena Watson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Connie Gove
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Jessica Etchevers
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Abby Hoffman
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Kimberly Chen
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Summer Singh
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Marisa McArthur
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Tanja Ross
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Lana Burstein
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.58
Michelle Thomsen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
Kristina van Prooyen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
Elizabeth Cha
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Shannan Bishop
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Linda Knauer
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Janine Braun
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Bodil Arlander
3W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.