Teams

2-CCouto-HR

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-06vs 4-KWalton-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Jaime Parker vs Christa McGill / Frances Henderson6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Garbee / Kateri Salk-Gundersen vs Dayna Kelly / Sandra Foye5-7, 0-6
2022-09-29vs 5-SShelby-CHCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Lutz / Kateri Salk-Gundersen vs Megan Jones / Christy Bowman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKay Mabe / Sharon Huang vs Sarah Shelby / Kylie Harris6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Jaime Parker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-22vs 1-ALeinbach-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Couto / Kateri Salk-Gundersen vs Kathy Orr / Beth Spinarski6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-09-15vs 3-PDovel/Cloer-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Sharon Huang vs Hallie Shinn / Adrienne Todd5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Erin Reiter vs Jennifer Holt / Ruth Coon6-2, 6-2
2022-09-01vs 4-KWalton-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesKay Mabe / Sharon Huang vs Elizabeth Keating / Heidi Blankenship4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKateri Salk-Gundersen / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Christa McGill / Sophie Brock4-6, 4-6
2022-08-25vs 5-SShelby-CHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Erin Reiter vs Deborah Howard / Stephanie McKenna6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarrie Couto / Jaime Parker vs Tina Cunningham / Allison Worthy2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-18vs 1-ALeinbach-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Cynthia Sundy vs Adrianne Leinbach / Karen Wood1-6, 3-6
2022-08-04vs 3-PDovel/Cloer-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesKay Mabe / Brynn Hale vs Patrice Dovel / Allison Graves6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Couto / Deborah Garbee vs Jeme Avent / Ruth Coon3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Beth Huebner
published 4
3.79
Kay Mabe
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Carrie Couto
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Melissa Lutz
published
3.50
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Erin Reiter
published 4
3.34
Jennifer Rousseau
published
3.28
Brynn Hale
published 3.5
3.20
Cynthia Sundy
published 3.5
3.11
Jaime Parker
published 3.5
3.07
Deborah Garbee
published 3.5
3.06
Kateri Salk-Gundersen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Huebner + Carrie Couto6453% games+7.2% vs expected
Carrie Couto + Elizabeth Wyngaarden171547% games−1.9% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Melissa Lutz4354% games−2.9% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Elizabeth Wyngaarden91150% games−4.0% vs expected
Erin Reiter + Carrie Couto1434% gamesnot enough data
Kay Mabe + Carrie Couto224 matchesnot enough data
Brynn Hale + Cynthia Sundy134 matchesnot enough data
Beth Huebner + Elizabeth Wyngaarden314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Huebner
50W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
4.10
4
Kay Mabe
139W–143L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Carrie Couto
163W–176L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Melissa Lutz
23W–17L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
111W–134L career · 5 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Erin Reiter
3W–18L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Jennifer Rousseau
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Brynn Hale
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Sundy
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jaime Parker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Deborah Garbee
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Kateri Salk-Gundersen
42W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.