Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Barnes & Simmons

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesAlethea Platis / Kanjamat Mullally vs Catherine Lind / Deborah Poe1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-26vs CV-Shadow Mountain/DentonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKanjamat Mullally / Alethea Platis vs Sonia Gleadle / Megan Bigbee6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJayne Freeman / Kanjamat Mullally vs Patricia Baughman / Gina Orban6-4, 6-4
2022-02-12vs CV-Palm Desert TC/Skone & SachaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Marcotte Solimano / Jennifer Ruddell vs Mary Kern / Ingrid Sarapuu2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-01-29vs CV-Shadow Mountain/DentonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Marcotte Solimano / Jennifer Ruddell vs Kim Hamlik / Megan Bigbee6-3, 7-5
2022-01-22vs CV-Palm Desert TC/Skone & SachaWon 20
W#1 DoublesKanjamat Mullally / Alethea Platis vs Suzy Skone / Carol Cornell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeg Zoretic / Jennifer Ruddell vs Myriam Wunder / Linda Blankenmeister6-3, 7-5
2022-01-15vs CV-Shadow Mountain/DentonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlethea Platis / Kanjamat Mullally vs Barbara Wood / Dianne Dalton6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ruddell / Holly Simmons vs Megan Bigbee / Sonia Gleadle4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Donald / Jennifer Ruddell vs Deborah Poe / Zayda Hiya-Ampao4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKarin Barnes / Karen Marcotte Solimano vs Jane Peller / Maribeth Pullman6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Karen Marcotte Solimano
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Kanjamat Mullally
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Alethea Platis
published 3.5
Holly Simmons
published 3.5
3.15
Barbara Maher
published 3.5
3.08
Janice Savidge
published
3.08
Jennifer Ruddell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Meg Zoretic
published
Tammy Roach
published
Teresa Urquhart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kanjamat Mullally + Karen Marcotte Solimano7072% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Marcotte Solimano
74W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kanjamat Mullally
50W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Alethea Platis
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Holly Simmons
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Maher
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Janice Savidge
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Ruddell
17W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Meg Zoretic
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tammy Roach
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Urquhart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.