Teams

Game, SACC, Match

2024 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKEND WOMEN · 4.0 Women Saturday

21 players · average NTRP 3.96 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Lacey Shannon
published
4.16
Josie Dorris
published
4.08
Audra Worrich
published 4
3.88
Amy Swaney
published 4
3.87
Bonnie Chumbley
published 4
3.84
Becca Noble
published 4
3.83
Carlisle Swann
published 4
3.82
Callie Musselman
published 4
3.79
Mariela Monagas
published
3.75
Monica Rowland
published
Beth Janicek
published 4
Dianne Littleton
published 4
3.65
Dorothy Basso
published
3.63
Marnie Simpson
published
3.63
Allison Hayne
published 4
3.61
Chaney Stuart
published 4
3.51
Marlo Carr
published
3.40
Denise Landon
published 3.5
3.31
Laura Guglielmo
published
Jolene Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlisle Swann + Audra Worrich4259% games+2.1% vs expected
Bonnie Chumbley + Audra Worrich5162% games−3.3% vs expected
Marnie Simpson + Dorothy Basso3348% games−3.7% vs expected
Bonnie Chumbley + Josie Dorris404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacey Shannon
16W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
4.23
Josie Dorris
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
4.16
4
Audra Worrich
25W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Amy Swaney
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Bonnie Chumbley
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Becca Noble
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Carlisle Swann
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Callie Musselman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Mariela Monagas
24W–24L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Monica Rowland
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Beth Janicek
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Catherine Matthews
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dianne Littleton
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Dorothy Basso
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Marnie Simpson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Allison Hayne
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Chaney Stuart
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Marlo Carr
36W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3.5
Denise Landon
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Laura Guglielmo
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Jolene Moore
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.