Teams

NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: Treesh/Scrogham

NIN FW Adult 40 & Over · NIN FW 40 & Over 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#2 DoublesMichael Scrogham / Brian Hart vs Mark Tipmongkol / Greg Salway5-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesElmer Toliver / Eric Tippmann vs Greg Salway / Joel Valcarcel2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChris Rodenbeck / Brian Hart vs MIKE MORGAN / Jeff Schneider6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRyan Treesh / Doug Douglas vs Jason Depuydt / Edward Pulhuj6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesWei Chen / Elmer Toliver vs Mark Kaufman / Jason Sagan1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrian Hart / Michael Scrogham vs Jason Depuydt / Mark Tipmongkol5-7, 2-6
2026-07-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesDinesh Agnihotri / Wei Chen vs Joshua Sutton / Matt Roussel6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-12vs NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: WW Sagan/SuttonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElmer Toliver / Doug Douglas vs Jason Sagan / Mark Kaufman3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesIgor Nikitin / Michael Scrogham vs Brent Davis / MIKE MORGAN5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-11Won 20
W#1 DoublesDinesh Agnihotri / Mark Heller vs Rex Peters / Jeff Schneider6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDoug Douglas / Eric Tippmann vs Jason Depuydt / Edward Pulhuj6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-28vs NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: WW Sagan/SuttonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDinesh Agnihotri / Wei Chen vs Greg Salway / Jeff Schneider6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDoug Douglas / Brian Hart vs Mark Kaufman / Joel Valcarcel0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NIN FW 40 & Over 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: WW Sagan/Sutton43101124188
2NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: Treesh/Scrogham34111025199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Elmer Toliver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Dinesh Agnihotri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Brian Hart
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Igor Nikitin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Michael Scrogham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Doug Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elmer Toliver
24W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Dinesh Agnihotri
47W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Brian Hart
24W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Igor Nikitin
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Michael Scrogham
14W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Doug Douglas
17W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.