Teams

Alachua/Banes/18&OverMxd

2024 Alachua Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesDrae Centonze / Kelly Banes vs Allison Bizub / Matthew Miller6-2, 6-0
2024-08-23vs 300 - PaulySplit 11
W#1 DoublesDrae Centonze / Paige Nicholson vs Donny Reeder / Lan Hoang-Minh6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBraedon Fulton / Morgan Jordan vs Eric Esterline / Sheena Prasad3-6, 1-6
2024-08-09vs 300 - PaulyWon 10
W#3 DoublesBraedon Fulton / Morgan Jordan vs David Hou / Alison Andrus6-0, 6-3
2024-07-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesBraedon Fulton / Morgan Jordan vs Matthew Miller / Allison Bizub7-5, 6-3
2024-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesDrae Centonze / Kelly Banes vs David Hou / Sheena Prasad6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Drae Centonze
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.36
Kelly Banes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Emily Dace
published
4.11
Braedon Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
Ekanong van Roy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Banes
published
Spencer Neville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ekanong van Roy + Kevin Banes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Drae Centonze
102W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.51
4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
Emily Dace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Braedon Fulton
22W–23L career · 8 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
4.11
Ekanong van Roy
92W–63L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Banes
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Spencer Neville
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.