Teams

SSC Weitzel Men

2022 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 M Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-19vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesRON NOURSE / Nate Macksey vs Dustin Keith / Vivek Kumar6-4, 6-3
2022-02-26vs Sarasota - LWN/WarriorsLost 02
L#2 DoublesNate Macksey / Gregory Childers vs Jonathan Cranos / Marc Neville6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJonathan Hancock / Peter Laughlin vs Wayne Osher / Brian Crupi4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-02-05vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesNate Macksey / Eric Abbott vs Ruben Bake / Kenneth Schwartz6-0, 6-0
2022-01-29vs Sarasota - LWN/WarriorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Jonathan Hancock vs William Masuck / David Arrowood6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNate Macksey / Gregory Childers vs Marc Pommainville / Wayne Osher6-3, 6-0
2022-01-15vs Sarasota - LWN/WarriorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Jonathan Hancock vs Robert Braatz / Jonathan Cranos6-3, 7-5
2022-01-08vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Hancock / Nate Macksey vs Dave Barcomb / Dale Slimick6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Nate Macksey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.85
Gregory Childers
published 4
3.78
Gustavo Risquez
published 4
3.72
Peter Laughlin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Eric Abbott
published 4
3.60
RON NOURSE
published
2.94
Cyndi Weitzel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Larry Anglada
published
Tim Mihm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Laughlin + Gustavo Risquez2450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nate Macksey
70W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Gregory Childers
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–175L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Peter Laughlin
76W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Eric Abbott
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
RON NOURSE
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3
Cyndi Weitzel
73W–73L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Larry Anglada
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Mihm
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.