Teams

Elings - Spanks a Lot

Adult 40 & Over - SB Summer 2021 · SB - Women - 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-08vs SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth FordLost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Gautier / Joann Hollingshead vs Stella Hahn / Jenne Lee Bonaccorsi5-7, 2-6
2021-07-25vs SBTC - Volley GirlsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNina Gustason vs Jill Crang3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Gautier / Heather Reed vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-27vs SBTC - Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 SinglesNina Gustason vs Ramona Weinstein0-6, 1-6
2021-06-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesNina Gustason / Catherine Gautier vs Pamala Temple / Jennifer Markham7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Kristen Kovacs
published 4
3.66
Kelly Jensen
published
3.61
Deborah Carlen
published 4
3.51
MARGARET LEARMONTH
published
3.46
Heather Reed
published 4
3.46
Patricia English
published
3.35
Joann Hollingshead
published
3.25
Catherine Gautier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Caroline Minor
published 3.5
3.14
Nina Gustason
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia English + Heather Reed6549% games+3.8% vs expected
Heather Reed + Kristen Kovacs9652% games+3.1% vs expected
Deborah Carlen + Heather Reed4355% games+0.7% vs expected
Nina Gustason + Catherine Gautier2842% games−5.2% vs expected
Patricia English + Kristen Kovacs0538% games−14.9% vs expected
Caroline Minor + Joann Hollingshead134 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Carlen + Kristen Kovacs123 matchesnot enough data
Nina Gustason + Kristen Kovacs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Kovacs
64W–86L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Kelly Jensen
25W–36L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Deborah Carlen
24W–19L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.61
MARGARET LEARMONTH
22W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
3.51
4
Heather Reed
69W–44L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
Patricia English
28W–39L career · no lines in 2021
64%36%<1%
3.46
Joann Hollingshead
12W–34L career · no lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Catherine Gautier
47W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Caroline Minor
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Nina Gustason
75W–99L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.