Teams

BHRC - Ernest 2025

2025 B'ham Combo - 55 & Over W · D

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-25vs PRC - CLARK 8.5 55Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Payne / Jenni Payne vs Deanna Carroll / Kim Griffith6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBarbara Smith / Walton Vandervoort vs Kim Nolen / Sherry Clark6-2, 6-1
2025-06-17vs PRC - CLARK 8.5 55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaveda Bradford / Shirley Vest vs Kim Griffith / Deanna Carroll4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJenni Payne / Kim Payne vs Kathy Honeycutt / Debbie Drake6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJerrie Burns / Catherine Ellis vs Sherry Clark / Tami Hansen1-6, 5-7
2025-06-16vs Greystone Y - BakerWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaveda Bradford / Shirley Vest vs Courtney Manasco / Suzette Pflaum2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Payne / Shelia Walker vs Kerry Blevins / Kim Hall1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Ernest / Jamie Burke vs Tracy Smith / Donna Gordon4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Greystone Y - BakerLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaveda Bradford / Jenni Payne vs Jenny Kimel / Patricia Randolph2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Smith / Walton Vandervoort vs Kerry Blevins / Tina Mills2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Ernest / Jamie Burke vs Kelli Baker / Laura Nevill4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · D
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRC - CLARK 8.5 553184999
2BHRC - Ernest 2025225716120
3Greystone Y - Baker135715109

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Jerrie Burns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Walton Vandervoort
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Jenni Payne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Shirley Vest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Kim Payne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
3.77
Shelia Walker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Barbara Ernest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Jamie Burke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Laveda Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laveda Bradford + Kim Payne3353% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Ernest + Jamie Burke213 matchesnot enough data
Laveda Bradford + Shirley Vest123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerrie Burns
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
Walton Vandervoort
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.06
Jenni Payne
56W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Shirley Vest
32W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Kim Payne
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Beth Carroll-Conwell
28W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Shelia Walker
25W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barbara Ernest
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jamie Burke
37W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Laveda Bradford
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.