Teams

Hunters Green Brigade - E. Collins

2021 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGregory Morrissey / Eddie Collins vs Gary Zirbel / Byron Gibbs Wilson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-10-31vs Hills - HCC Young Guns/J. SchneiderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Cotey / Michael Dasilva vs Jose Alomar / James Schneider6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGregory Morrissey / Eddie Collins vs Randy Sterns / Javier Espinoza7-5, 6-4
2021-10-24vs Temple Terrace Hawks - R. WarrenerLost 01
L#1 DoublesEddie Collins / Gregory Morrissey vs George Hawkins / Gary Zirbel1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Patrick Rairigh vs Eugen Schwarz / James Schneider4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Cotey / Michael Dasilva vs Jose Alomar / Ken Chin4-6, 5-7
2021-10-03vs Temple Terrace Hawks - R. WarrenerLost 02
L#2 DoublesJohn Cotey / Michael Dasilva vs Gary Zirbel / George Hawkins4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Ken Kranick vs Robert Chen / Lawrence Palombo2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGregory Morrissey / Patrick Rairigh vs Donald Bell / Javier Espinoza7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Cotey / Michael Dasilva vs Eugene Martineau / Chi Ming Yu6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Eddie Collins
published 4
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Gregory Morrissey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Doug Angelone
published 3.5
3.23
Ken Kranick
published
3.15
Patrick Rairigh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
John Cotey
published
John Slatniske
published
Michael Dasilva
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Cotey + Doug Angelone314 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Morrissey + Patrick Rairigh303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 1 line in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Gregory Morrissey
131W–125L career · 4 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Doug Angelone
9W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
Ken Kranick
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Patrick Rairigh
108W–103L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
John Cotey
16W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Slatniske
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Dasilva
81W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.