Teams

Team 5

2022 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri Level 4.0, 3.5 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-06vs Team 8 Tri-rificLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Ballard / Jenifer Heilig vs Eve Pandit / Alissa Forbes2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-11-29vs Team 3 Stronger 2getherLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaroline Kahl / Terry Siegfried vs Kristin Satterfield / Galina Orlova3-6, 1-6
2022-11-15vs Team 1 Lady High RollersLost 01
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Pritsios / Jenifer Heilig vs Erica Smedberg / Laureen Matta4-6, 2-6
2022-11-03vs Team 6 Queens of the CourtWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnna McLean / Jenifer Heilig vs Tara Reynolds / Olga Minsky6-2, 6-3
2022-11-01vs Team 1 Called to ServeLost 01
L#3 DoublesJenifer Heilig / Ann Ballard vs Maria Browne / Varsha Chandra2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-10-25vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaroline Kahl / Terry Siegfried vs Elizabeth Clarke / Yulan Jin3-6, 3-6
2022-10-20vs Team 4 Triple ThreatLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenifer Heilig / Alison Weiss vs Joanna Schindler / Eleanor McManus7-6, 3-4
2022-10-11vs Team 2 Triple ThreatLost 01
L#3 DoublesShannon Dubke / Jenifer Heilig vs Stephanie Fultz / Sara Franklin2-6, 4-6
2022-09-27vs Team 9 Tri and Catch usLost 01
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Pritsios / Jenifer Heilig vs Kristin Kahn / Michelle O'Brien4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-20vs Team 8 Tri-rificWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Kahl / Terry Siegfried vs Eve Pandit / Cynthia Grubbs2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri Level 4.0, 3.5 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Lisa Karlisch
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.40
Stephanie Elsheikh
published
Gibson McMahon
published 3.5
3.09
Suzanne Pritsios
published
3.06
Jenifer Heilig
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.87
Pam Murphy
published
2.79
Terry Siegfried
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Ann Ballard
published 3
2.69
Caroline Kahl
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Ballard + Jenifer Heilig213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Karlisch
40W–60L career · 7 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.46
Stephanie Elsheikh
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Gibson McMahon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Pritsios
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Jenifer Heilig
37W–29L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
Pam Murphy
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Terry Siegfried
33W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Ann Ballard
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Caroline Kahl
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.