Teams

BParo

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-22vs GJimenezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Edwards / Blake Paro vs Joshua Collins / Osama Said4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLawrence Brock vs Pete Vammino6-0, 6-4
2022-05-01vs JJonesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / Graham Schillmoller vs Justin Jones / Jeff Bell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBlake Paro / Paul Flick vs John Wagner / Aaron Vedder7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2022-04-24vs SLav 4.0 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / Andrew Tate vs Craig Atkinson / Emanuele Michi7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBlake Paro / Ben Barwick vs John Rabby / Eric Moritz6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Ball / Graham Schillmoller vs Christopher Bricker / Jeffrey Monaghen7-5, 6-2
2022-04-03vs PHOLDERNESSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / Andrew Tate vs Ted Sherburne / Paul Holscher6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGraham Schillmoller / William Edwards vs Penn Holderness / Mike Hennen7-6, 6-1
2022-04-01vs JCannonCCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBlake Paro / Graham Schillmoller vs Jeffrey Nottingham / John Highsmith2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Tate / Lawrence Brock vs Roy Gaines / Matthew Horney6-0, 6-1
2022-03-20vs IRXuWon 20
W#1 DoublesBlake Paro / Graham Schillmoller vs Patrick Shields / Ryan Sheppard6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLawrence Brock / Andrew Tate vs Daniel Knox / Miguel Materin6-3, 6-1
2022-03-06vs JGouveiaWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Tate / Lawrence Brock vs Joe Goatcher / Jeff Chaffin6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBen Barwick / Blake Paro vs Craig Chapman / Scott Hoffman6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lawrence Brock
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.90
Graham Schillmoller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.81
Andrew Tate
published 4
3.75
Kenneth Krause
published
3.52
Blake Paro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Brock + Graham Schillmoller472159% games+2.3% vs expected
Blake Paro + Graham Schillmoller3346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lawrence Brock
326W–122L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Graham Schillmoller
170W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Andrew Tate
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Kenneth Krause
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Blake Paro
53W–42L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.