Teams

CCV Levy / Goodwin

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-25vs Salisbury AndrewsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Kate Beckler vs Zoe Emerson / Mandy Tornabene5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Levy / Kirsti Goodwin vs Virginia Totaro / Melissa Brunner-Brown6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-23vs TDC LongSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Robin Reifsnider vs Michele Limoges / Heidi Collier7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Jennifer Levy vs Leslie Baker / Fran Wigner1-6, 1-6
2021-06-16vs Raintree ReedLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Levy / Kirsti Goodwin vs Donna Moody / Susan Evans3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-02vs ACAC Callaghan / BartholomewWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Reifsnider / Kerry DeLacey vs Tonya Wade / Trisha Smith6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-26vs Woodlake CookseyWon 20
W#1 DoublesSharon Loving / Kerry DeLacey vs Laura Kelly / Susan Zielinski6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Jennifer Levy vs Laurie Cooksey / Carol Beth Cook4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-21vs WOCC PommersheimWon 10
W#1 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Jessica Morton6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Katherine Shiveley
published
3.92
Hayes Blackburn
published 4
3.84
Kerry DeLacey
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.48
Mary Beth Scott
published
3.44
Anne Taylor Schaaf
published 3.5
2.98
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Levy
published
Kim Cressy
published
Lauren Hepper
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Shiveley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Hayes Blackburn
12W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Kerry DeLacey
143W–100L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
Mary Beth Scott
13W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Anne Taylor Schaaf
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 4 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Cressy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lauren Hepper
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.