Teams

Bashi Bazouks

2022 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-06-21vs SmashersWon 30
W#1 DoublesPreston Peranich / Brent Kendall vs Alexander Gerson / Johnny Hsiung7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBengt Liljas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Whitall / Daniel Lawson vs Fatih Selekler / Roger Fox4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-15vs CJ RocksWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoshua Folk / Brent Kendall vs Wei Shao / Zengzhu Xu6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Whitall / Thomas Leuba vs Renhuan Xu / Sai Maddi6-3, 7-6
2022-06-12vs RogersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Brent Kendall vs Jeff Rosenblum / Bryan Kay7-5, 7-5
2022-06-08vs Insane Klein-Miletti PosseLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristopher Gosselin / Bengt Liljas vs Christopher Johnson / Geoffrey Montgomery6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Payne / Juan Jose Tijero vs Richard Laukitis / Edison Penafiel0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Whitall / Thomas Leuba vs Ryan Rohn / William Wong3-6, 4-6
2022-06-01vs SmashersWon 30
W#2 DoublesDavid Whitall / Thomas MacNevin vs Daniel Berland / George Lamont6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBengt Liljas vs Mikhail Laryukhin6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrent Kendall / Brian Bichy vs Christopher Bragale / Bradley Jacques6-1, 6-3
2022-05-23vs CJ RocksWon 20
W#1 DoublesBengt Liljas / Christopher Gosselin vs Sai Maddi / Jagannath Surampudi6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPreston Peranich / Brent Kendall vs Yi Zhang / Renhuan Xu7-5, 6-1
2022-05-19vs RogersWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrent Kendall / Bengt Liljas vs James Lincoln / Renaldo Savady2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Lawson / Thomas Leuba vs Keenan Minogue / Ping Fan6-4, 6-0
2022-05-15vs Insane Klein-Miletti PosseSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristopher Gosselin / Bengt Liljas vs Richard Laukitis / Jordan Zimmerman6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Thomas MacNevin vs Christopher Johnson / Henry Forster7-5, 6-3
2022-05-02vs SmashersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Payne / Juan Jose Tijero vs Perry Toskov / Bryan Necciai6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoshua Folk / David Whitall vs Daniel Berland / Johnny Hsiung6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrent Kendall / Scott Miller vs David Nazari / Tom Oda6-7, 5-7
2022-04-29vs CJ RocksWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Gosselin / Bengt Liljas vs Jing Gu / Chris Ji6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Whitall / Thomas MacNevin vs Shuang Chen / Wei Shao6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Burgreen / Thomas Leuba vs Yi Zhang / Renhuan Xu6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-19vs RogersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBengt Liljas / Christopher Gosselin vs Jeff Rosenblum / Alain Zidouemba6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-09vs Insane Klein-Miletti PosseLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Whitall / Juan Jose Tijero vs Richard Laukitis / Edison Penafiel6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Brian Bichy
published 4.5
3.91
Brent Kendall
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Bengt Liljas
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.79
Thomas Leuba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Daniel Lawson
published 4
Darren Felix
published 4
3.74
Joshua Folk
published
3.72
Juan Jose Tijero
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
David Whitall
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.21
Florin Iancu
published 3.5
John Payne
published
Zaf Basha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Bichy + Brent Kendall211154% games+1.2% vs expected
Brian Bichy + David Whitall6259% games−4.0% vs expected
Bengt Liljas + Brent Kendall7652% games−11.9% vs expected
Bengt Liljas + Brian Bichy2440% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Leuba + David Whitall1440% gamesnot enough data
Brent Kendall + David Whitall3251% gamesnot enough data
Bengt Liljas + David Whitall224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Bichy
170W–104L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
4.17
4
Brent Kendall
184W–123L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Bengt Liljas
128W–99L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Thomas Leuba
98W–92L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Daniel Lawson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Darren Felix
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Folk
24W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Juan Jose Tijero
606W–366L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
David Whitall
78W–80L career · 7 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Florin Iancu
30W–34L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
John Payne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zaf Basha
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.