Teams

KY/LOU/MILLIGAN/CHESSLER

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.93 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-02vs KY/LOU/SUNLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Marie Washbish vs Katie Nichols2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Eckmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amanda Freibert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Ann Marie Washbish
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Cammie King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.66
Ursula Melhuish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.57
Amy Brennenstuhl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Libby Milligan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Drew Andreoli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Allison Chessler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Jenny Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Alex Nessenthaler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Sandy Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ruth Powderly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Marie Washbish + Cammie King314 matchesnot enough data
Libby Milligan + Allison Chessler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Eckmann
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda Freibert
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ann Marie Washbish
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Cammie King
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Ursula Melhuish
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Amy Brennenstuhl
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Libby Milligan
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Drew Andreoli
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Allison Chessler
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Jenny Ballard
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Alex Nessenthaler
2W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Edwards
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Ruth Powderly
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.