Teams

Carrollwood Chicks with Sticks - B. Kuntz

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs Sara Kim1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-28vs TYCC Court Krewe - C. SimmonsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Julia Serynek vs Julianne Hendrickson / Susan Langford6-4, 6-2
2022-10-21vs Palma Ceia Overserved - S. TuttleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJackie Botet / Raquel Pullaro vs Shelby Tuttle / Erin Annis1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Miller vs Brittney Herron - (DQ)*0-6, 1-6
2022-10-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCrystal Shanique Bethel vs Brittney Herron - (DQ)*1-6, 0-6
2022-10-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesNatalya Burlakova vs Brittney Herron - (DQ)*1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKristin Nail / Raquel Pullaro vs Valerie Carrillo / Lacy Gregory3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrittney Herron - (DQ)* vs Brittany Cooper6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-16vs Avila Aces - L. SouthwellLost 02
L#1 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Jenna Melasi vs Nicole Hasselbach / Jessica Mathews2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Southwell vs Brittney Herron - (DQ)*1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Brittney Herron
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kristin Nail
published 3.5
2.81
Becky Kuntz
published 3
2.72
Jackie Botet
published
2.68
Raquel Pullaro
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.64
Erika Sumner
published
Vanessa Martinez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raquel Pullaro + Becky Kuntz7753% games+10.3% vs expected
Becky Kuntz + Erika Sumner8257% games+4.5% vs expected
Raquel Pullaro + Kristin Nail303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brittney Herron
95W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Kristin Nail
80W–30L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Becky Kuntz
53W–61L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Jackie Botet
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%6%94%
2.72
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Erika Sumner
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.64
Vanessa Martinez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.