Teams

PKartes/RBombien (Mountainbrook)

2025-2026 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 4.0 Men Doubles; Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-16vs SGerbereux (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Blandford / Rudy Bombien vs Scott Gerbereux / Brian Jennaro1-6, 1-6
2026-01-07vs STyagi/BSchwartz (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Patrick Kartes vs Benjamin Schwartz / Saurabh Tyagi6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Patrick Blandford vs Kyle Harding / Ken Griffin1-6, 4-6
2025-12-10vs TJames (CSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Patrick Blandford vs Ted James / Reed Griffith7-5, 6-3
2025-11-24vs KSathyamoorthy (Lifetime)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Blandford / Thomas Dukes vs Todd Paris / Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy6-2, 6-0
2025-11-12vs YVora (BCC); J & A BCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Rudy Bombien vs Yatish Vora / Jeff Adams4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 4.0 Men Doubles; Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGerbereux (OPRC)8080023
2YVora (BCC); J & A BCC6161249
3SHickey (OPRC)6161345
4AMiller (Life Time); Flexin6262557
5RWilkes (PPRSC); PPRSC Mayhem and Motrin Flex4444969
6PKartes/RBombien (Mountainbrook)3333756
7ASchuman/WKing (Freedom Park)3333860
8MJarzynski (Mountainbrook)3434968
9NLeCroy/BHarrell (WSRC)3434963
10STyagi/BSchwartz (Queens)35351079
11AWeil (PPRSC); PPRSC JDAAT35351178
12FStewart (CSRC); Charlotte AC26261288
13ABridges/Prasannakumar (Jeff Adams)26261387
14PPietruczuk (Windyrush); Piotr Kevinsons1414848
15AMcWilliams (OPRC); AWG - OP1414958

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Rudy Bombien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Thomas Dukes
published
3.54
Patrick Kartes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Patrick Blandford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rudy Bombien + Patrick Kartes231155% games−2.3% vs expected
Rudy Bombien + Patrick Blandford8747% games−5.0% vs expected
Patrick Blandford + Patrick Kartes4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rudy Bombien
86W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Thomas Dukes
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Patrick Kartes
103W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Patrick Blandford
97W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.