Teams

WP GREEN

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-02vs GPTC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Terming Chew vs Suresh Gevaran / Lani Reichardt6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-25vs NJ PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Abdo / Belinda Nelson vs Beth McCarty / Kevin Thistle7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristen Padberg / Matthew Shiveley vs Jennifer Ashley / David Tomlinson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Lynn Pearson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-18vs MC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Terming Chew vs Chris Vinci / Dori Webb3-6, 3-6
2023-06-10vs DTC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Kristen Padberg vs Eric Snelgrove / Janice Jensen4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerming Chew / Matthew Shiveley vs John Tolva / Katy Curry0-6, 2-6
2023-05-28vs APR-E GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Abdo / Lynn Pearson vs Tracy Brunschwig / Michael Nobles0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTerming Chew / Matthew Shiveley vs Carlie Odau / Tom Weaver3-6, 3-6
2023-05-21vs NJ GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Kristen Padberg vs Brant Lahnert / Mary Jo George6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Andrew Tiktin
published 4.5
3.86
Greg Hamilton
published
3.84
Terming Chew
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Kristen Padberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.54
Joseph Abdo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.52
Lynn Pearson
published
3.52
Belinda Nelson
published 3.5
Erica Nollen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terming Chew + Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas4152% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Tiktin
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Greg Hamilton
31W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Terming Chew
84W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Kristen Padberg
78W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
3.5
Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas
127W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
4
Joseph Abdo
26W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Lynn Pearson
23W–32L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Belinda Nelson
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Erica Nollen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.