Teams

meow

2025 Pine Belt Singles League · 2.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-23vs Brewchester United 2.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesDexter Evans vs Tristan Clemons0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTyler Hill vs Scott Stephenson1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJack Sims vs Avery Hanson6-2, 6-4
2025-11-20vs Brewchester United 2.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesShiron Manandhar vs Michael Butler1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTyler Hill vs Scott Stephenson1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesDexter Evans vs Tyler Mcclellan6-2, 7-6
2025-11-13vs Brewchester United 2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesJack Sims vs Luciano Mendonca6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJacob Barlow vs Scott Stephenson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTyler Hill vs Tyler Mcclellan6-2, 6-3
2025-11-02vs Brewchester United 2.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesDexter Evans vs Avery Hanson1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesFred Lyons vs Tristan Clemons1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJack Sims vs Tyler Mcclellan6-0, 6-3
2025-10-30vs Brewchester United 2.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesNate Oswalt vs Luciano Mendonca4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTyler Hill vs Scott Stephenson1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJacob Barlow vs Tristan Clemons6-7, 3-6
2025-10-23vs Brewchester United 2.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesShiron Manandhar vs Luciano Mendonca6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTyler Hill vs Avery Hanson2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJack Sims vs Scott Stephenson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-16vs Brewchester United 2.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesDexter Evans vs Luciano Mendonca1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesFred Lyons vs Avery Hanson3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesShiron Manandhar vs Michael Butler1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Jack Sims
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.31
Dexter Evans
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.22
Nate Oswalt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.13
Shiron Manandhar
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.12
Fred Lyons
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Jacob Barlow
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Tyler Hill
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Sims
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.45
2.5
Dexter Evans
3W–14L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Nate Oswalt
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Shiron Manandhar
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Fred Lyons
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Jacob Barlow
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Hill
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.