Teams

LPRE-Reich//Bailey Road Park 18+ 2.5

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women Wednesday 18s

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesCorinne Deuel / Bobbi Hoppe vs Hanna Schoenrock / Catherine Wulfhorst1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDoga Karyaldiz / Sydney Miller vs Beth Franck / Jennifer Johnston5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Lukan / Patty Reich vs Bernadette Bender / Debra Orr5-7, 2-6
2026-08-19vs LSSW - Swaney & Siler/JettonLost 03
L#1 DoublesSana Beg / Maria Jose Lara vs Barbara Bitel / Geraldine Gardner4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFlora Harrington / Katheryn White vs Taylor Gill / Laura Troyer5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Hopkins / Amy Hanrahan vs Sruthj Gugunta / Inga Siler6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-12vs LMCA - Cassidy 5.0 / Caldwell ParkLost 03
L#1 DoublesCorinne Deuel / Deborah Lukan vs Michelle Cassidy / Tonya Bishop4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBobbi Hoppe / Rona Juban vs Grace Helmuth / Melissa Marlowe1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatty Reich / Samantha Mallette vs Sarah Teague / Beverly Futrell4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Wednesday 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Corinne Deuel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.40
Doga Karyaldiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.38
Rona Juban
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Patty Reich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Katheryn White
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.09
Deborah Lukan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.09
Flora Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Bobbi Hoppe
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.00
Maria Jose Lara
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.78
Jessica Hopkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Reich + Deborah Lukan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Corinne Deuel
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
2.5
Doga Karyaldiz
23W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Rona Juban
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Patty Reich
13W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Katheryn White
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Deborah Lukan
1W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Flora Harrington
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Bobbi Hoppe
6W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Maria Jose Lara
1W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Jessica Hopkins
0W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.