Teams

Da.Driscoll18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-10vs Al.Sheehan18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusie EL-Kaissi / Susan Flanagan vs Mary Dee Smith / Elisabeth Sanchez4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hembarsky / Leslie Wright vs Kris Wordsworth / Amanda Williams6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDaphne Driscoll / Nancy Gugliotta vs Laura Clark / Julie Sandridge3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-09vs Ma.Schantz18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Beth Beam / Angela Pleasants vs Noelle Jackson / Kimberley Matthews6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Raftery / Susie EL-Kaissi vs Suzanne Brown / Theresa Poulsen6-1, 6-1
2024-09-10vs Al.Crumpler18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesLUCY LAV / Susie EL-Kaissi vs LeAnne Bloedon / Kristi Koren4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-03vs Ki.Johnson18C7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Pleasants / Monica Collins vs Sandy Wood / Caroline Fungaroli4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusie EL-Kaissi / Susan Flanagan vs Tobi Buckley / Phyllis Soltz6-4, 6-0
2024-08-27vs Sh.Agresta18CWon 21
L#1 DoublesMonica Collins / Julie Raftery vs Jane Hunter / Christina Jenkins4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDaphne Driscoll / Nancy Gugliotta vs Ilona Peszlen / Kimberly Walker6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Flanagan / Susan Hembarsky vs Jennifer Holloman / Shannon Phillips6-4, 6-4
2024-08-20vs La.Ross18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathryn Beth Beam / Nancy Gugliotta vs Gillian Sellick / Laura Ross2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusie EL-Kaissi / LUCY LAV vs Rachel Matthews / Kelly Townsend6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-13vs Al.Sheehan18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMonica Collins / Angela Pleasants vs Kate Cannon / Nancy Harvin2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Hembarsky / Leslie Wright vs Kris Wordsworth / Ashley Vaughan1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Susie EL-Kaissi
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Julie Raftery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Kathryn Beth Beam
published
3.44
Angela Pleasants
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.40
Nancy Gugliotta
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.25
LUCY LAV
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Susan Hembarsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LUCY LAV + Susie EL-Kaissi312060% games+1.9% vs expected
Angela Pleasants + Julie Raftery5546% games+0.5% vs expected
Angela Pleasants + Susie EL-Kaissi8360% games−0.9% vs expected
Susie EL-Kaissi + Julie Raftery8461% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Gugliotta + Susie EL-Kaissi3747% gamesnot enough data
LUCY LAV + Susan Hembarsky3257% gamesnot enough data
LUCY LAV + Julie Raftery3254% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Gugliotta + LUCY LAV134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susie EL-Kaissi
253W–127L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
4
Julie Raftery
156W–120L career · 2 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
Kathryn Beth Beam
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Angela Pleasants
189W–94L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Nancy Gugliotta
166W–152L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
LUCY LAV
231W–188L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Susan Hembarsky
102W–133L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.