Teams

*2-SRyan-CHTC

2024 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-02vs *4-NBuckley-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesDoug Kopec / Timothy Buckley vs Chris Sansone / Glen Blumhardt6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-25vs *6-RGildehaus-YMCA-55Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGary Glish / Timothy Buckley vs Vincent Illiano / Michael Meyers3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Dischinger / Doug Kopec vs David Holub / Ed Holub5-7, 3-6
2024-04-18vs *3-VStiebris-HS-55 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesDan Tudor / Doug Kopec vs Mark Macdonald / David Evert6-2, 6-1
2024-04-11vs *5-RKern-CHTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGary Glish / Steve Dischinger vs Richard Goldberg / Jonathan Fischer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDoug Kopec / Joseph Kennedy vs T Powell / Louis Arne4-6, 3-6
2024-04-04vs *1-SClark-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Dischinger / Doug Kopec vs Glen Hacker / Steve Pigora7-5, 6-4
2024-03-21vs *6-RGildehaus-YMCA-55Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGary Glish / Doug Kopec vs Peter Bream / James White3-6, 4-6
2024-03-14vs *3-VStiebris-HS-55 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesRandy Cubrilovic / Gary Glish vs David Stefan / Ralph Russo6-2, 6-3
2024-03-07vs *5-RKern-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Dischinger / Gary Glish vs Mark Thomsen / T Powell6-4, 6-3
2024-02-29vs *1-SClark-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesGary Glish / Randy Cubrilovic vs Steve Pigora / Philip Chang7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Dan Tudor
published 3.5
3.31
Randy Cubrilovic
published
3.30
Gary Glish
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Doug Kopec
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Timothy Buckley
published
3.25
Bob Stocking
published 3.5
3.14
Steve Dischinger
published
2.63
Eric Vance
published 3
Stephen Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Kopec + Gary Glish18662% games+5.8% vs expected
Randy Cubrilovic + Stephen Ryan213 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Buckley + Gary Glish303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Tudor
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Randy Cubrilovic
24W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Gary Glish
141W–124L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Doug Kopec
82W–58L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
Timothy Buckley
32W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Bob Stocking
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Steve Dischinger
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Eric Vance
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
Stephen Ryan
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.